Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Kobal2  Uh ? How come Growth 0 is more overtax profitable than Growth 3 ? | 
	
 
	Quote:
	
	
		| It's only relative profitability. Growth will always be more profitable in the absolute sense. But like I was saying earlier, growth isnt any sort of 'counter' for overtax losses. | 
	
 Exactly. I didn't set my spreadsheet up to do comparisons because I was looking for the breakeven point. If you copy the whole thing to a new sheet, I'm sure you can set up a comparison column.
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Squirrelloid  The Demon: that's turns until the turn income is higher without overtaxing, yes?  What about cumulative income?  How long until the *total* income collected in the province is higher if you just let it go?  (I'd check myself, but strangely enough i don't have excel on this computer - maybe i'll look tonight) | 
	
 I mentioned both.
For 30k pop:
	Quote:
	
	
		| At Growth 0, Growth 3, and Death 3, the last turn the income for 150% tax is greater than the income for 100% tax is turn 20, 19 and 21 respectively. | 
	
 This is per turn income.
	Quote:
	
	
		| At Growth 0, the last turn the total income for 150% tax is greater than the total for 100% tax is turn 42. At Growth 3, the last turn the total income for 150% tax is greater than the total for 100% tax is turn 39.
 At Death 3, the last turn the total income for 150% tax is greater than the total for 100% tax is turn 45.
 | 
	
 Total income = cumulative income