Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir
Quote:
Originally Posted by scJazz
As for the Abrams... with only two of them and each being so expensive it is hard for me to put them in a place where they are at risk. Unlike the Cobras if I screw up and advance them to far it is very difficult to get them out of harms way.
|
USMC doctrine is that tanks are infantry support NOT anti-armor.
The USMC uses close air support, helos, and ATGMs for anti-armor. |
I realize having read you saying this about USMC anti-armor doctrine many times
I've just been finding that the number one Support job is anti-armor. My jarheads are doing just fine on their own once the tank layer is gutted.
***HORRIFIED SCREAM***
Just started Mission 4... 20 artillery sections and 8 MLRS just opened up on me. I can see 45 tanks 15 Helos and a wall of APCs.
Wishing I had traded the frickin Abrams in but I got stubborn and I didn't.
Re: USMC vs N. Korea and China
Threaded Mode