|
|
|
 |

January 10th, 2003, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Banning tech trades and population trades is not as easy as it sounds. The menu check box "No Tech Trades" does not prevent trading ships or planets. There should also be a N0 TRADES box.
Having weaker neighbors to early on (capturing pop and colonizers) can unbalance the game.
Limited warfare can be used to capture population and ships. But.. If there is little risk due to prior agreements, then it is wrong for a no (tech) trade game.
[ January 10, 2003, 21:27: Message edited by: Wardad ]
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:32 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Quote:
Originally posted by Arkcon:
Yeah, well, MM made it so you can't do it anymore, so I guess it is an exploit, innit?
|
Really? How would they do that?
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:37 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
>So Gravey, if you think it is ok to use an >exploit when no one else knows about it, then >yes that is cheating.
I have heard this argument time and time again. Who are you to decree what is an exploit and what isn't? The only person who can decide is the game host for the game your are playing. He decides the rules of the game, including whether any of the currently known bugs are ok or not. If you break those rules it is cheating. If you dont then it isn't. Simple as that. If you dont like his decision as to what is ok and what isn't you play something else or start your own game or whatever. What you don't do is lable evryone else who doesn't conform to your view as a cheater.
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:38 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
and please dont bother with the mythical exploit that only 1 person knows about. The bugs in SEIV very quickly become public knowledge.
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:40 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Ok guys... that game is over. There is no need to continue arguing about it here on Shrapnel.
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:42 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
But but but... he started it.
In any case. WE're not aguing about _that_ game at least to my knowledge. I'm just arguing about something I feel strongly about.
[ January 10, 2003, 21:45: Message edited by: gravey101 ]
|

January 10th, 2003, 11:45 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
"Yeah, well, MM made it so you can't do it anymore, so I guess it is an exploit, innit?"
You can still open warp points to adjactant systems, and it's still quite possible to build a more efficent warp network..so no.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|