|
|
|
 |

January 15th, 2003, 08:11 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Parts Unknown, NY
Posts: 295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Wanderer, just to add to your post.
Even if the Turkish guy was a petty officer, as long as he was in command of the ship he is "the Captain".
When the old WWII battleships were brought out of mothballs (the New Jersey was one), they were refit with superior combat radar and targeting systems, communications, the engineering was upgraded somewhat, the Phoenix CIWS was installed, and yes Tomahawks were added in time to the weapon complement. Someone found out that those 16-inch guns were quite useful in the age of missile weaponry. This is a good example of mothballing old warships and bringing them back in with retrofitting.
__________________
I'm about to turn it up a notch!!
Where's the ka-boom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering ka-boom!
|

January 15th, 2003, 08:54 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 442
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Quote:
Originally posted by Cheeze:
Wanderer, just to add to your post.
Even if the Turkish guy was a petty officer, as long as he was in command of the ship he is "the Captain".
|
When on a ship you command, as a Naval officer, you are indeed "Captain _____".
When going aboard another vessel, or being introduced while at an offshore place (say, an officer's club, or an Embassy, or whatever), youw ould be (for example) "Lieutenant _____, commanding the _______".
If you hold the ACTUAL, direct, rnak of captain, and go aboard a ship you do NOT command, you are given a "courtesy promotion" to the rank of Commodore. Why?
So that when, in a crisis, someone shouts out "Captain!" ... everyone knows who's being spoken to. The captain of THAT ship, and not the guest who happens to hold the -rank- of captain.
Or so this landlubber has been given to understand things, at any rate. 
[ January 15, 2003, 07:03: Message edited by: Pax ]
__________________
-- Sean
-- GMPax
Download the Small Ships mod, v0.1b Beta 2.
|

January 15th, 2003, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Quote:
Originally posted by Gozra:
I have read this thread from stem to stern and I have yet to hear of anything as Gamey. Therefore I am doubling the prize to 20 Galatic Credits.
|
You might as well raise it to a couple billion. Because if you see nothing wrong with the tactic SumariaProgrammer mentioned then clearly you are someone who thinks anything and everything is OK in the game.
|

January 16th, 2003, 02:04 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Quote:
"You want the moon on a stick"
|
You could mod that quite easily in planetsize.txt
|

January 15th, 2003, 07:23 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 317
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Quote:
Originally posted by DavidG:
quote: Originally posted by Gozra:
I have read this thread from stem to stern and I have yet to hear of anything as Gamey. Therefore I am doubling the prize to 20 Galatic Credits.
|
You might as well raise it to a couple billion. Because if you see nothing wrong with the tactic SumariaProgrammer mentioned then clearly you are someone who thinks anything and everything is OK in the game. I am unable to find this reference.
And I do think if its allowed by the game you can do it. But I also think Gentlebeings rules for playing the game should be followed. For instance I agree with GEO that no trading should limited so as to make the game more interesting.
__________________
The fact that slaughter is a horrifying spectacle must make us take war more seriously, but does not provide an excuse for gradually blunting our swords in the name of humanity. Sooner or later, someone will come along with a sharper sword and hack off our arms
Clausewitz
|

January 15th, 2003, 08:44 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
I believe he is refrencing the post made, where a player traded an un visited system for an AI home planet. That was very gamey imo. I also think retro-series building is gamey. the 50% max is there for game balance reasons, and to prevent abuse (retro-series sphereworlds). Doing a retro-series bypasses a game design. retro fitting while in mothball does not. big difference. retro-series building is gamey imo.
Taking advantage of a stupid AI is also gamey, IE trading an unvisited system for a homeworld. The gamey part is in the thought of even attempting this, not in the fact the AI was stupid enough to agree to it.
Those that think it is not gamey, are of the same class of people that think nothing is a crime if you don't get caught. All I say to that, is know who your entering into a MP game with. If you accept a game challange from people that feel anything goes, then don't complain later that they lived up to their reputation. or, try and be more cheezy than they are. Hacking game files is blantant cheating, and if done will suceed in noone playing a game with you again. I am talking about questionable tactics, not outright cheating.
send the credits to realpissed_2000@yahoo.com. thank you.
__________________
It's all just a perspective of matter.
|

January 15th, 2003, 09:36 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: PBW ethics, opinions please.
Retro-series building can possibly double the cost of building the ship. It is balanced already. 
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|