OT: Rating the President

[E. Albright]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Anyone happen to have saved a Version of the thread before it was slashed? We could easily pick up from there.

Well, the Last thing I remember posting (or seeing, 'cause I think it was posted during the Crunch) was a missive rife with atrocious wordplay based on Mutually Assured Destruction and Nuclear Use Theorists. All told, the death of that post might well be counted a blessing, given the popular opinion of plays on words...

I'm half-tempted to resume where I'd left off, but I'll be good. No gas on the fire.

E. Albright

[kalthalior]

It would seem that the US still has friends in Europe, despite news reports to the contrary.

London Times Editorial

[Perrin]

Originally posted by tbontob:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Krsqk:
According to the forum main page, Geo, Mephisto, SJ, and Atrocities are Moderators. ISTR that Instar is also SpecOps, though. Maybe there are more unlisted Moderators that I can't remember.

Well, I don't know if they will find this helpful or relevent, but it happened in a 18 minute period between 16:00 and 16:18 of Jan 26th.

I was accessing the posted Messages to prepare my post and made the post at 16:18.

---

Could the slammer worm be responsible for the missing Posts?

[Preacherman]

my post is gone where i stated that i don't want to participate in this thread any more, so i'm free again

It would seem that the US still has friends in Europe, despite news reports to the contrary.

It was never in question wether the us has friends in europe or not, they have, but friendship is not that we always are your opinion. i am from germany, i do not like bush, i often do not like his politics and i certainly am not for a war without a resolution by the un, but that means not that i do not like americans! i hope you see the differences.

the same probably goes for much of europe, and your london times aticle does not state that around 70% of the brits and about 80% of the polish people... are against a war without the un.

[Fyron]

Do you expect the media to ever give a fair account of anything? They leave facts out of all stories that conflict with what they want to report.

[Phoenix-D]

"the same probably goes for much of europe, and your london times aticle does not state that around 70% of the brits and about 80% of the polish people... are against a war without the un. "

If you read the article, you might notice it never mentions going it alone. According to that, Iraq is in violation of the UN accords and should be invaded because of that.

And if anyone says "give him another chance" if and when these inspections fail..how -many- "another chances" are we talking about here? This isn't the first time this has happened.

Phoenix-D

[oleg]

The problem here is that Irag does not have an underclared weapons of mass destruction. At least, there is no any proof of it. What we have is Bush' rhetoric and empty accusations. Prove me that I am wrong.