|
|
|
 |

January 26th, 2003, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 558
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
If i were to play against humans, i would choose finite because it's more realistic. Against TDM races i always choose infinite resources otherwise the AI is to much weakened by this.
__________________
A Se++ GdY $++ Fr+ C++++ Csc Sf++ Ai** AuO M MpT MpSk MpFd S--- Ss- RV Pw Fq Nd- Rp- G Mm++ Bb++ Tcp+ L++
|

January 26th, 2003, 08:27 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
I prefer infinite. I think the resources disappear much too fast in finite games. How can you suck a planet dry in less than 20 years? In terms of time, infinite if realistic.
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|

January 26th, 2003, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
Having completed (just) four games, I think finite resources would hurt the AI more than myself, because I know how to take advantage of the asteroid fields and the AI doesn't.
|

January 26th, 2003, 09:21 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
I think finite resources can be fun if you are playing against other human players. The AI is not so good at handling it. It also helps to increase the finite amounts in settings.txt to extend a finite game - or just use FQM with all those plentiful asteroid fields.
|

January 27th, 2003, 12:14 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
"I have noticed some people are playing SEIV gold, and others are playing SEIV 1.49. Lots of threads about what people would like to see in the next patch, too bad thay can't put out a special patch that would put all of us on the same page. (IE upgrade 1.49 to 1.78 gold, or whatever the current patch # will be). I am a little supprized they didn't do that when the "gold" was released. "Gold" should be the final Version of a game, not a new Version. The gold should have been called SEV, and they would be working on SE6 now. It just strikes me as odd."
Gold was essentially an expansion pack to SE4. It was sold the way it was because if you sell it stand-alone, the coding is easier AND you can attract new players easier. Classic doesn't get any patches anymore because all the focus is on Gold (like how SEIII doesn't get any patches anymore), and no upgrade patch because then Malfador wouldn't get paid. Which they deserve every penny of IMO.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

January 27th, 2003, 12:39 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
Gold does not mean a new game, it means an expansion of the original game. Normally, a lot of new features are included in the Gold, but it is not enough to be considered a new game.
|

January 27th, 2003, 12:56 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Finite resources or not?
Phoenix-D
I agree with you. I would think there would be a patch to upgrade to Gold.
As Fyron says it is not really a new game.
I must say I am a bit surprised as I had just assumed MM had provided a patch for the upgrade to Gold.
__________________
Know thyself.
Inscription at the Delphic Oracle.
Plutarch Morals
circa 650 B.C.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|