.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
Bronze- Save $10.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 28th, 2001, 07:25 PM
raynor's Avatar

raynor raynor is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
raynor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

I would like a couple of very small, very minor interface enhancements:

Right now, when you click on a spot on the scrollbr, it moves you right to that spot. But the default behaviour in Microsoft Windows is to scroll down a page.

Also, when you have two list boxes open and click to move an item from one side to the other, the list should maintain its current position. Right now, it puts you back at the top of the list.

Other than those two minor pet peeves of mine, I am quite impressed with the interface. I think the programmer is a genius to have considered so many angles and given us so many extremely useful ways to view information.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 28th, 2001, 09:09 PM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

Also, when you design an empire in game setup there is no WARNING that you have not selected a design names file. It's a bit annoying to start designing ships and discover that you forgot this. And when you do select one, the txt files are not sorted by name as files are in nearly every other part of the program. This can make it hard to find the one you want when you've added many to the directory.

Finally, as someone pointed out in another thread, when empires are generated randomly they don't seem to stick with the design names file put in their general settings. Instead they select randomly. Now, if TWO empires have the same file I can see making a substitution, but this always random change disturbs part of the "character" of the empire by changing the design names unecessarily.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 28th, 2001, 09:36 PM

apache apache is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
apache is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

I would like if the planets window did not display any planets that there is no known path to. For example, if you shut off yourself by closing warp points, yet know about several systems outside your holdings, those planets should not show up in the planets screen because you cannot get to them. Perhaps this should be an option, though I cant ever think of any situation where you would need to see the planets you can't travel to. It would make colonizing a lot easier when you close yourself off from the rest of the galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 28th, 2001, 11:20 PM

Lloyd Heilbrunn Lloyd Heilbrunn is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lloyd Heilbrunn is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

I'm pretty new at this game,so there might be a way to do some of these already that is not in the manual,but I'd like to see the following:
1.Unless I'm upgrading designs don't show ship names already in use so I don't get a you can't use this name message.
2.Allow retrofits from the Ships/Fleets screen.
3.Show some type of indication what the other empires might like to trade for or what they have that I need.

These are more setup than interface-

4.Allow a random 2000/3000/5000 empire to be given to me as it already does for the computer.
5.Allow me to save a favorite type of game setup.
6.After I choose my empire and game setup and begin the game, allow a reroll of the map only, without making me start a whole new game if my starting position is horrid
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 29th, 2001, 12:57 AM
Atrocities's Avatar

Atrocities Atrocities is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Atrocities is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

I agree, these are great suggestions.
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 29th, 2001, 01:21 AM

God Emperor God Emperor is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
God Emperor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

Barnacle Bill - I too agree with your suggestions (particularly 3 and 4).

Must admit though that I've never had enough ships for pts 1 and 2 to be a major problem (I tend to play in small or medium galaxies).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 29th, 2001, 04:04 PM

Barnacle Bill Barnacle Bill is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Barnacle Bill is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interface improvement suggestions for patch

quote:
Originally posted by God Emperor:
Must admit though that I've never had enough ships for pts 1 and 2 to be a major problem (I tend to play in small or medium galaxies).


I play in huge galaxies and mothball rather than scrap ships I can’t afford to maintain. I also build lots of space yard bases, usually keeping one on permanent “repeat build” of more of its own type. So I end up with lots of ships, especially at the space yards where all those space yard bases and mothballed ships pile up.

BTW, there is no need to ever stop production of new ships because you are resource strapped. Just keep building and, if everything but your current production class is already mothballed, mothball those brand new ships the turn they are completed. If they stay mothballed for just a few turns, the cost to de-mothball is less than what the maintenance would have been during those turns, and they can be de-mothballed much faster & cheaper than building new ships (instantly, if you have the resources). So, you have a 0 maintenance reserve that can rapidly be brought up to replace battle casualties or (at the expense of construction because of the increased maintenance) expand the fleet temporarily for a war.

As to the ones that get obsolete while in mothballs, you can scrap mothballed ships without de-mothballing, so they are a form of resource storage. Remember, if your storage facilities are full any unused resources go to waste. So, keep building at all your shipyards all the time if you can afford it & mothball what you can’t afford to maintain. BTW, the same strategy works for satellites but they have to be in space at a planet with a shipyard to scrap them. This will let the non-shipyard planets get in the resource storage act, but you’ll need to send transports around to collect them. You can then scrap all those obsolete satellites & mothballed ships at need to get resources for de-mothballing your modern ships in a crisis.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.