|
|
|
|
 |
March 1st, 2003, 11:21 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
Folks,
Life is short.
Can we accept a few things and put this all behind us?
1) Body language and Tone inflection do not come across in text.
2) There really is no reason to believe that anyone here meant to offend / upset / insult / piss off etc.. anyone.
3) What has been posted in text if delivered over a table with friends would have come across completely differently and no one would have taken offence..
4) We all have different personalties and when all is said and done it just does not matter how the post is delivered.
Can we accept the above and go forward with an unmitigated understanding:
If you think someone meant to offend then you probably misunderstood.
To define "Meant" - The person actually intended to offend / upset / insult / piss you off
|
March 2nd, 2003, 12:54 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
Good thing you are all getting this out of your system...
Gryphin Words of Wisdom my friend
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
March 2nd, 2003, 01:05 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
Fyron:
You asked why you was rated low. I answered.
Feel free to take my words as constructive criticism, or dismiss them as ravings from a mad man.
Either way this discussion is over from my side.
__________________
Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
|
March 2nd, 2003, 04:23 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
One quick question: If the "big one" came and everything on the seaward side of the San Andreas fault fell into the ocean, would:
Alta Loma/Riverside, CA, USA
still be on land or in the ocean?
This is purely a geography-type questions.  |
March 2nd, 2003, 04:38 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
raynor, it depends on what music was playing at the time.
|
March 2nd, 2003, 04:43 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
Quote:
Originally posted by raynor:
One quick question: If the "big one" came and everything on the seaward side of the San Andreas fault fell into the ocean, would:
Alta Loma/Riverside, CA, USA
still be on land or in the ocean?
This is purely a geography-type questions.
|
First off, that is impossible. There is no such thing as a "big one" quake that could do that much damage. The area is not tectonically unstable enough for that to be possible. But if (and that is a big if) it did happen, Alta Loma would be screwed. |
March 2nd, 2003, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible
I am prepared. I own future ocean front property in Arizona. 
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
