.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 14th, 2003, 08:32 PM
Ruatha's Avatar

Ruatha Ruatha is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ruatha is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

Live and learn!

Slick, I guess you'll be hearing from Fyron about this
The monolith economy is very close to his heart I belive!

I just like to see those shiny high tech facilities, not spewing enviromental waste as those mineral mines are doing!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 14th, 2003, 08:47 PM
cybersol's Avatar

cybersol cybersol is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cybersol is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

It might be obvious, but no one has explicity mentioned it. If you really wanted to build the monolith economy, but still gain maximum resources as soon as possible. Would you not build the normal economy first, say resource II's. But for the final two facility slots build a space yard for improved build and start the first monolith. As each monolith completes, scrap a normal facility and build another monolith. It is a lot a micromanagement, but it will get you the most resources along the way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 14th, 2003, 08:52 PM
Slick's Avatar

Slick Slick is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Slick is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

Quote:
Originally posted by cybersol:
It might be obvious, but no one has explicity mentioned it. If you really wanted to build the monolith economy, but still gain maximum resources as soon as possible. Would you not build the normal economy first, say resource II's. But for the final two facility slots build a space yard for improved build and start the first monolith. As each monolith completes, scrap a normal facility and build another monolith. It is a lot a micromanagement, but it will get you the most resources along the way.
Yes, I didn't mention this but it does work. Once again, do a few case studies because for every system there are disadvantages.

Ruatha, of course, I expect it; I am not the kind of person who needs to have the Last word on everything. I am not trying to convince anyone of anything; I am trying to show people how to come up with the answers that are right for themselves and their play style. The people here are smart enough to make up their own minds. If anyone has a play style they like or prefer, then that is the one that is right for them - the game mechanics will always be the same but different play styles can certainly be used effectively.

Slick.

[ June 14, 2003, 19:59: Message edited by: Slick ]
__________________
Slick.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 14th, 2003, 09:17 PM
cybersol's Avatar

cybersol cybersol is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cybersol is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

Quote:
Originally posted by Slick:
quote:
Originally posted by cybersol:
It might be obvious, but no one has explicity mentioned it. If you really wanted to build the monolith economy, but still gain maximum resources as soon as possible. Would you not build the normal economy first, say resource II's. But for the final two facility slots build a space yard for improved build and start the first monolith. As each monolith completes, scrap a normal facility and build another monolith. It is a lot a micromanagement, but it will get you the most resources along the way.
Yes, I didn't mention this but it does work. Once again, do a few case studies because for every system there are disadvantages.

Well, early on it has all the advantages of the normal economy system expect the one facility per planet you have to leave empty to build the monolith. And later, only 30 turns later on a huge AST world, you start to gain the advantages of the monolith economy. Except for the hassle of micromanagement I would say that is the way to go in the long run. At steady state, you sacrifice 1k of production for 3-5 turns to get 2.7k of production. Thus each monolith III becomes net positive (even with just converter I) 4-6 turns after it is completed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 14th, 2003, 09:32 PM
Slick's Avatar

Slick Slick is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Slick is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

Quote:
Originally posted by cybersol:
quote:
Originally posted by Slick:
quote:
Originally posted by cybersol:
It might be obvious, but no one has explicity mentioned it. If you really wanted to build the monolith economy, but still gain maximum resources as soon as possible. Would you not build the normal economy first, say resource II's. But for the final two facility slots build a space yard for improved build and start the first monolith. As each monolith completes, scrap a normal facility and build another monolith. It is a lot a micromanagement, but it will get you the most resources along the way.
Yes, I didn't mention this but it does work. Once again, do a few case studies because for every system there are disadvantages.

Well, early on it has all the advantages of the normal economy system expect the one facility per planet you have to leave empty to build the monolith. And later, only 30 turns later on a huge AST world, you start to gain the advantages of the monolith economy. Except for the hassle of micromanagement I would say that is the way to go in the long run. At steady state, you sacrifice 1k of production for 3-5 turns to get 2.7k of production. Thus each monolith III becomes net positive (even with just converter I) 4-6 turns after it is completed.

Agreed in principle that it is better than the either/or approach. However don't forget the cost of the Monolith: 10,000 Min; 5000 Org; 5000 Rad. In those 4-6 turns that the previous one starts to turn a small profit, you have started constructing the next monolith which puts your economy as a whole for that planet back into a deficit situation again.

Again, I recommend laying out turn by turn a few cases. In each case consider resources spent, made and the time it takes till the next facility is built. Most of the time in this game (as in real life), income now is much more valuable than income later even if it is more because you can put it to work now instead of later.

Remember, your enemies might not be courteous enough to wait until you have a huge planet filled with monoliths established long enough to be superior over single facilities before they attack.

Slick.

[ June 14, 2003, 20:49: Message edited by: Slick ]
__________________
Slick.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 14th, 2003, 10:27 PM
Ruatha's Avatar

Ruatha Ruatha is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ruatha is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

Quote:
Originally posted by Slick:
Remember, your enemies might not be courteous enough to wait until you have a huge planet filled with monoliths established long enough to be superior over single facilities before they attack.

Slick.
But, but, but..
Are they allowed to be so nasty?
Whatever happened to Peace, loving and understanding?


[ June 14, 2003, 23:38: Message edited by: Ruatha ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 14th, 2003, 11:23 PM
Fyron's Avatar

Fyron Fyron is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Fyron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Strategy Articles!

I never once advocated building solely monoliths right off the bat... I only start building them after my economy is well off and can support the deficits incured with Monolith construction without problems (and I start off slowly; I don't just suddenly have 50 worlds start on Monoliths all at once). Also, absorbing a few minor empires early on helps cover those deficits too.

It is a good idea to build a SY as the first facility on new worlds in general because if you need to use them, you now have a bunch of SYs available to build colony ships, warships, and whatever else you want.

The cost to build monoliths is immaterial (esp. when you wait until you get a strong economy going before building them). What else are you going to do with those resources, build more ships than you need?

Also, keep in mind that once my Monolith economy is going, I build them on all resource worlds. A 100/30/30 planet produces more with Monoliths than just Mineral Miners, after all. Will it take longer to even out? Sure, a few more turns. Big deal.

Furthermore, Monoliths are not for small empires. They are for large empires (100s of planets). Starting to build Monoliths when you only have a few dozen planets (and esp. when there is still a lot left to colonize) will only get you killed.

Building a Robotoid Factory III after the 4th Monolith often takes just one more turn than a Monolith, and gives many more resources than a Robotoid on a planet with normal miners does (as there is much more base production).

The fact that monoliths take longer to build can work to your advantage. Normal economies max out a lot sooner than a Monolith economy (and a proper Monolith economy will not be too far behind the normal one when this happens), while the Monolith economy still has a lot of growth left. I would have to disagree with the statement that some resources now are better than more resources later. In most situations, waiting a dozen turns or so is well worth the investment. If you are being destroyed, then of course building Monoliths is not going to help much. Emergency situations call for normal miners.

Keep in mind that it is rather easy to get Monoliths built in 3 turns a piece on all worlds with more than a few facility slots (HI, 120 const, SY III, Jubilant pop). Again, the resources to build them are only an issue if you are engaged in a losing war. If you are in no wars or in a winning war, then the high cost to build Monoliths is a null issue.

And by the way, I know how to do algebra.

Here are some numbers for a PBW game I am in:
Huge (255 system) map, 17 players, turn 142

1st: 8.7 M points, 299 planets, 4.2 M resources
2nd: 4.5 M points, 142 planets, 1.1 M resources
3rd: 4.1 M points, 117 planets, 387.5 K resources
4th: 3.7 M points, 158 planets, 507.5 K resources

Guess what the 1st place player did? You guessed it, Monoliths. 2nd place has been building Monoliths recently, but is very far behind. 1st place can not get enough ships built to use up resources, so many 100k of them get wasted each turn (he lost something like 140 ships in an ongoing war thanks to those damned Talismans). And, 1st place doesn't even have HI in this game (he was a PBW newbie when it began, afterall).

There was another empire that was in 2nd for the whole game, and using normal miners. He managed to destroy several empires too. He surpassed 1st place player for about 20 turns, but his unrelenting aggression forced the peace loving races of the galaxy to go to war to stop him. He is in 8th now. When (current) 1st place entered the war, each of them was producing about 1.0 M resources, and he had more planets than (current) 1st place did. This was some 50 turns ago.

So in summation:

Short term: Monoliths = bad
Medium term: Monoliths = roughly equivalent (with only low net loss)
Long term: Monoliths = super good

If you only care about short term gains (such as early game, small maps, early wars), go with normal miners. If you care about long term gains (large maps, mid-game, no early wars that are not resulting in you steamrolling over a minor empire), go with Monoliths.

-===-

About Remote Miners:
Again, using them is only good in the short term. In the long term, it is much better to build planets out of asteroids and build normal miners or Monoliths on them (as the situation dictates).
__________________
It's not whether you win or lose that counts: it's how much pain you inflict along the way.
--- SpaceEmpires.net --- RSS --- SEnet ModWorks --- SEIV Modding 101 Tutorial
--- Join us in the #SpaceEmpires IRC channel on the Freenode IRC network.
--- Due to restrictively low sig limits, you must visit this link to view the rest of my signature.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.