|
|
|
 |

March 20th, 2003, 07:34 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
Tbontob, as I said I wasn't taking sides. Please don't take this as an admonishment. I understood the reasons for your Posts. Yes we are all human, but I wasn't even suggesting you made a mistake. I was assuming you did it intentionally to goad Fyron a bit.
I know he can be annoying at times. "Ragging" is something he seems to particularly enjoy. My prefered method of pointing it out to him is to speak to others about him in a slightly disapointed, patronizing way. The way you would speak about a particularly rambunctious child to other adults. Discussing it with him standing right there, but not directly acknoledging him as if he isn't. He hates that.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

March 20th, 2003, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
Quote:
The next step is figuring out what benefits are lost when you add armor instead of (for instance) a shield generator (or a shield REgenerator, or a weapon, or a supply storage component, or a solar sail, or whatever). SJ's example assumes that you'd replace shield generator(s) with the stealth/scattering armor.
|
I think that's a fair assumption, since what the algorithm does is to optimize the defensive strength of ship using only the space already allocated to shields.
Quote:
I don't think SJ was claiming the 187.5 value was the break-even point, that was just a specific value for the effect of an extra 15% combat defense bonus, and he was comparing that to the break-even point he'd originally referenced. That effect needs to be compared to the size and structure of the component providing that bonus (i.e., stealth armor or scattering armor) and also compared to the size, structure, etc. of the components removed from the design to make room for the stealth/scattering armor.
|
Actually I was. That number takes into account the change in hitpoints, and the ECM bonus of 15%.
[ March 20, 2003, 17:51: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 20th, 2003, 07:47 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
Quote:
Originally posted by spoon:
quote: Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
1) Take the shield points currently generated.
2) Estimate the typical hit rate that your enemy has against your ship.
3) Multiply your answers from (1) and (2), then divide by 100.
4) If the answer you get is:
less than 1200 : Do not bother with Stealth or Scattering armor.
from 1200 to 1670 : Add a Stealth armor only.
1670 or higher : Add both Stealth and Scattering armor.
|
I thought you were dividing by the hit rate in (2). Is this the correct formula you propose, where:
s = shield points
h = percent of being hit (decimal)
x = (s)(1/h)(1/100)
Maybe if you go through an example for me, I will be enlightened. Say 500 shield points, 60% chance of being hit, after armor bonuses added (lvl 6, both armors).
Thanks!
-Spoon Aw, man. Can you believe I'm in a math program at university?
1) Take the shield points currently generated.
2) Estimate the typical hit rate that your enemy has against your ship.
3) Divide your answer from (1) by your answer from (2), then multiply by 100.
4) If the answer you get is:
less than 1200 : Do not bother with Stealth or Scattering armor.
from 1200 to 1670 : Add a Stealth armor only.
1670 or higher : Add both Stealth and Scattering armor.
[ March 20, 2003, 17:48: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 20th, 2003, 08:12 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
Geo
I did take what you said as "constructive criticism". In a very real and very positive sense.
If I cannot take an honest opinion and reflect on it, then I am not being honest with myself. Worse, I could be living a lie.
I wasn't so much as goading as I was determined not to let Fyron off the hook this time. Fyron uses a number of tactics to prove to himself he is right and to give the impresssion to others he is always right.
One of his Favorites is the subject change. When he feels he is losing the arguement, he will change the subject or throw it in a new direction where he can come out on top.
Unfortunately, most participants in the conversation don't realize he is doing this. They are always put in a position of "losing" and there is often bewilderment and anger over it.
I cannot recall the number of times he has used this tactic on me. I recognize it and usually stop participating. Since he has the Last word, he believes he has won the issue, which couldn't be further from the truth. I just refuse to go along with the subject change. This time I didn't.
Fyron has yet to learn there is no shame in being wrong and openly admitting it. Then real growth can take place.
I do consider Fyron a friend. I am just getting tired of the tactics being used on me. So this time I took it to the limit...to the amusement of everyone around us.
And yes, there was an element of goading. The fact I did it in the manner that I did is an indication of how annoyed I was becoming with the tactics being used. 
__________________
Know thyself.
Inscription at the Delphic Oracle.
Plutarch Morals
circa 650 B.C.
|

March 20th, 2003, 08:18 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
To that formula:
This is a formula that counts with: Space reqired by component's, damage dealt, different % to hit and of course overall defense points. It works also with many extreme examples.
Abbreviations used in examples and formula:
su = Space used. Total of space the components take up on ship.
sr = Space required for components. Count in kt. Add ALL components.
dd = Damage dealt. Pick any number bigger than 1.
mp = Modified percent. Attacker's percent to hit(again, choose any number) minus your defense adjustment(count OLNY bonus from component).
dv = Defense value. Add damage resistance(in kt) and additional points(shield or armor).
How it works?
1: (dd*mp1/100) - (dv1*sr2/sr1)
Count.
2: (dd*mp2/100) - dv2
Count.
Compare. Smaller wins.
Example1:
Let's say you have 50 kt of free space on ship. Enemy can deal you 1000 points of damage and he hits 60% of time. First ship has an armor and second a shield generator.
Armor requires 50 kt's adds 150 armor points and 15% to defend.
Shield generator reqires 40 kt and adds 375 shield points.
sr1 = 50
sr2 = 40
dd = 1000
mp1 = 45
mp2 = 60
dv1 = 200
dv2 = 415
1: 1000*45/100 - 200*40/50 = 290
2: 1000*60/100 - 415 = 185
Shield wins.
Example2:
Let's say you have 210 kt of free space on ship. Enemy can deal you 1000 points of damage and he hits 60% of time. First ship has 4 shield generators and 1 armor and second has 5 shield generators.
Armor requires 50 kt's adds 150 armor points and 15% to defend.
Shield generator reqires 40 kt and adds 375 shield points.
sr1 = 210
sr2 = 200
dd = 1000
mp1 = 45
mp2 = 60
dv1 = 1850
dv2 = 2075
1: 1000*45/100 - 1850*200/210 = -1312
2: 1000*60/100 - 2075 -1475
Shield wins(but slightly).
This is not a failure. Here really the shield wins. After all, if the armor gives you 15% to defense it is as if it gave you one sixth more defense. That also means that on average only after 6 shields it pays off to have an armor.
Try to slightly increase the % of shield. You'll see the results you probably want to see.
Of course this formula does NOT include all possibilities but it covers most common situations.
|

March 20th, 2003, 08:22 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
I almost forgot: The break even point is easy find. Just give those two sides into eqation. That't the exact break-even point.
|

March 20th, 2003, 08:39 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Stealth and Scattering Armor bonus
Is your damage dealt supposed to be the effective hitpoints of the ship, rather than just any number?
__________________
Things you want:
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|