|
|
|
 |

April 5th, 2003, 06:09 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm
Great web site.
The t-72 is out classed in this war.
Now if the American's do attack Sryia...
What weapons do they have.
I assume t-72 's , variations of the t-55 , and modern artie..
Most likely on par with IDN
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|

April 5th, 2003, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
Quote:
Originally posted by tesco samoa:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm
Great web site.
The t-72 is out classed in this war.
Now if the American's do attack Sryia...
What weapons do they have.
I assume t-72 's , variations of the t-55 , and modern artie..
Most likely on par with IDN
|
BBC says this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/788180.stm
__________________
Think about it
|

April 5th, 2003, 06:41 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/syrscud.htm
Shakes head and thinks that these people are so stupid.
__________________
Think about it
|

April 5th, 2003, 10:02 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
I don't understand your comment.
Who are the stupid ones, the institute or the Syrians ?
__________________
Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
|

April 5th, 2003, 10:19 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
I don't understand your comment.
Who are the stupid ones, the institute or the Syrians ? Anyone that thinks these weapons are worth having. They really only work on civies, and often strike the side that set them loose. They are not WMD, they are terror weapons.
__________________
Think about it
|

April 6th, 2003, 02:22 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
Thermo:
From your link:
"From a strategic perspective, long-range missiles such as the Scud could offer a means to deliver chemical weapons in response to Israel’s nuclear threat."
They are designed to be terror weapons. They are doing exactly what they are supposed to do. That's sad, but it's not stupid.
__________________
Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
|

April 6th, 2003, 02:36 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
The AK's are popular in the Middle East(along with the Isralie Galil, which has some similiarities) BECAUSE they're simple, easy-to-maintain designs which withstand temperature extremes well.
No, it's not up with the latest rifles, but it's pretty much ideal for light infantry forces in desert conditions where techical expertise is scarce.
The (mainly ex-russian) RPG launchers they use are fairly tough and robust as well.
__________________
Game Design Student
GSV Phoenix Flys High
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|