# of members ?

Fyron · #1 June 7th, 2003, 06:17 AM

He said constantly active, which means a number of Posts per day at least. One post a week is active, but not "constantly active".

Kamog · #2 June 7th, 2003, 07:09 AM

Well, I started counting, and I got to about 40, but it's difficult to say who is "constantly active" and who is not. A few people are obviously constantly active, but many do not post every single day but do post often, so it's hard to say.

Taera · #3 June 7th, 2003, 08:01 AM

for one thing you are

Slynky · #4 June 7th, 2003, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
He said constantly active, which means a number of Posts per day at least. One post a week is active, but not "constantly active".

Perhaps we shouldn't measure "constantly" active by Fyron standards...

.

Also, I count active by whom I see when I pop in...not necessarily who Posts something. Of course, the term, "active", may infer more than just reading

.

Fyron · #5 June 7th, 2003, 10:11 PM

Yes, "active" requires more than just lurking.

narf poit chez BOOM · #6 June 7th, 2003, 10:33 PM

me active.

taz hyperactive. hey, i'm a luie? when did that happen? over 600 Posts? guess i do post alot.

[ June 07, 2003, 21:37: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ]

Stone Mill · #7 June 7th, 2003, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Slynky:

quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
He said constantly active, which means a number of Posts per day at least. One post a week is active, but not "constantly active".

Perhaps we shouldn't measure "constantly" active by Fyron standards... .

Also, I count active by whom I see when I pop in...not necessarily who Posts something. Of course, the term, "active", may infer more than just reading .

Quantifying Fyron's forum activity is undefinable by our current mathimatical tools.