want to see a movie. recomendations?

Atrocities · #1 July 5th, 2003, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TerranC:
28 Days Later is promising.

I won't post a link here to not offend those who don't take gore easily.

Ah a remake of the Omega Man. Not very promising at all.

Atrocities · #2 July 5th, 2003, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Taera:
Please put SPOILER ALERT to the topic now seriously Atrocities, they have SkyNet there????? SKYNET??? IN TERMINATOR 3? SKY. Net. In Terminator. Three.

Fallout 2 anyone?

Um, oops.

My Bad.

Lord Kodos · #3 July 5th, 2003, 02:53 PM

If anything 28 Days Later seems to me like Resident Evil 2.

Dont get me started on the entire Survival-Horrer game Genre. To paraphrase Penny Arcade: Survival Horror basically amounts to "Things will jump at you from windows"

Lol. Although I heard RE was fairly decent, and the guy who did the music for it did do the music for Invader Zim.

And yeah, T2 is still the best, with good ol' Mercury Man. lol.

Alpha Kodiak · #4 July 5th, 2003, 05:35 PM

If you are looking for a movie that makes you think, is fun, but doesn't have a lot of violent action (some but not a lot), and you can get past the Disney label, I would recomment Holes. I took my kids to see it, and loved it. Lots of plot twists and convoluted interactions. I suppose it is a bit dated now, I don't get out to the movies much, but if it is still out, I highly recommend it.

General Woundwort · #5 July 5th, 2003, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atrocities:

quote:
Originally posted by TerranC:
28 Days Later is promising.

I won't post a link here to not offend those who don't take gore easily.

Ah a remake of the Omega Man. Not very promising at all.

Actually, I think it's supposed to be a remake of Dawn of the Dead.

BTW, Narf (and to whom else it may concern), if you want the absolute lowdown on any movie, go here first...

RottenTomatoes.com

PvK · #6 July 5th, 2003, 08:18 PM

I saw T3 and Matrix II. I thought they both offered some good action sequences... in fact, they were both pretty close to being non-stop action sequences. I thought neither were as well-done, in non-action terms, as the films before them in their series. But if you want some impressive action sequences, both are good for that. I'd probably prefer T3 to M2.

I've only seen ads of The Hulk and am already sick of it. I can't stand ultra-fake-o computer animations whose physics stink, nor the annoying corporate brand-name hype assault. For example, my local grocery store, owned by the vile Kroger empire, is trying to sell Hulk muffins and even an entire Hulk cake for like $25! I'd much rather watch an old Super Friends cartoon (not to mention an old Buggs or Road Runner cartoon).

PvK

Narrew · #7 July 5th, 2003, 09:02 PM

I think Sean Connery has only gotten better and better as he has gotten older, it will be sad when he is no longer doing movies. I am looking forward to watching the LXG.

Ohh, Last weekend I was over at a friends and saw what must be the very worst Bond movie ever. I can't remember the guy that took over for Connery but he was lame, no wonder Connery came back for the next movie.