|
|
|
 |

July 7th, 2003, 09:33 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
I realize your questions are geared toward a particular goal (or curiosity).
But, a couple other questions might have been asked:
(1) Do you think the mix of planets and atmospheres gives equal opportunity to any planet type and atmosphere.
(2) What is your favorite galaxy type?
(3) Which galaxy type would you like to see improvements upon?
(of course, this assumes you are interested in adding to what you have already done)
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

July 7th, 2003, 09:57 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
1. I think Ice gets the rough side, but it might just seem that way. I've seen the discussions, and the math, and I've never played Ice.
2. I like Huge Dense Clusters
3. I just like the Clusters, nice pinch points and things.
|

July 7th, 2003, 10:18 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
Cluster's rock! I love them. It's great to play a game with equal ammounts of races per clusters. And if you designate starting points it starts off pretty equal for all races. Or as equal as you can get with a generated map without spending ages on it!
Oh BTW, thank you Fyron for creating this mod, it's made my SEIV games much more interesting and less repetitive
[ July 07, 2003, 21:21: Message edited by: Raging Deadstar ]
|

July 7th, 2003, 11:00 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
The one I use for solo play is the
Dence Paradice I moded to make a Threaded Spiral.
|

July 7th, 2003, 11:29 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
That is a nice distribution of votes on question 1. 2 votes for the Last option would make it perfectly symmetrical.  Not that 2 votes for that one would be good, but it would look nice.
Quote:
(1) Do you think the mix of planets and atmospheres gives equal opportunity to any planet type and atmosphere.
|
I can answer that right now. They do not. I forget exactly who has the advantage, but I think that Ice planets get a slightly smaller percentage of facility space than they do in unmodded SE4. The atmospheres are no longer quite balanced, but they are close. This is a result of disproportional numbers of new planet images from the Image Mod. I added nearly all of the images from there, and they seem biased towards certain types of planets. 
|

July 8th, 2003, 12:03 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
I'd like to see a quad that came with few warp points. Something like 2 or three per system.
__________________
Think about it
|

July 8th, 2003, 01:53 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
You can get that effect by using these settings on any quadrant:
code:
Max Warp Points per Sys := 3
Min Angle Between WP := 60
Adding a 3rd set of quadrants that are WP-lite would be IMO kind of excessive...
[ July 08, 2003, 01:18: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|