|
|
|
 |

July 7th, 2003, 11:29 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
That is a nice distribution of votes on question 1. 2 votes for the Last option would make it perfectly symmetrical.  Not that 2 votes for that one would be good, but it would look nice.
Quote:
(1) Do you think the mix of planets and atmospheres gives equal opportunity to any planet type and atmosphere.
|
I can answer that right now. They do not. I forget exactly who has the advantage, but I think that Ice planets get a slightly smaller percentage of facility space than they do in unmodded SE4. The atmospheres are no longer quite balanced, but they are close. This is a result of disproportional numbers of new planet images from the Image Mod. I added nearly all of the images from there, and they seem biased towards certain types of planets. 
|

July 8th, 2003, 12:03 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
I'd like to see a quad that came with few warp points. Something like 2 or three per system.
__________________
Think about it
|

July 8th, 2003, 01:53 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
You can get that effect by using these settings on any quadrant:
code:
Max Warp Points per Sys := 3
Min Angle Between WP := 60
Adding a 3rd set of quadrants that are WP-lite would be IMO kind of excessive...
[ July 08, 2003, 01:18: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|

July 8th, 2003, 02:39 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
You can get that effect by using these settings on any quadrant:
code:
Max Warp Points per Sys := 3
Min Angle Between WP := 60
Adding a 3rd set of quadrants that are WP-lite would be IMO kind of excessive...
|
I know that, but I was looking for an easy one step method 
__________________
Think about it
|

July 8th, 2003, 05:48 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
Gotta expect laziness from a walking corpse. They don't make much energy, do they? 
|

July 8th, 2003, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
For those of you that voted increased, what specifically would you like to see added?
|

July 8th, 2003, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: FQM Poll: Quadrant Choices
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Gotta expect laziness from a walking corpse. They don't make much energy, do they?
|
I'll have to think about that one. Does something that is energy, make energy? I'll do it later, time to rest up a little 
__________________
Think about it
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|