|
|
|
 |

July 14th, 2003, 10:16 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
If you allow them to rush you early on or you allow the other players to all gang up on you, then obviously you have not been playing very well at all. 
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:19 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:20 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
You cannot control your opponents. You can play a perfect game with the talisman and still lose.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:22 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
Quote:
Originally posted by rdouglass:
IF, sometimes I am totally amazed at the logic you use to justify your position. It doesn't matter what you say, you CAN do everything perfectly and still lose with the Talisman.
|
I have a feeling that his statments aren't based on logic this time. Perhaps this is one of those times he's playing the devil's advocate.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:25 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
Well, you can try to buy time with diplomacy as I've done myself a few times, but I would argue that that only works with inexperienced players or with players who aren't really in it for the win. I guess it's also easier to do on a map with lower player density. If I'm playing in a game where I want to compete I will do everything I can possibly can to bring down a religious player before he gets the Talisman, and have generally found it easy to assemble/encourage coalitions and knock those zealots off early.
[ July 14, 2003, 21:27: Message edited by: gravey101 ]
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:37 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
Quote:
IF, sometimes I am totally amazed at the logic you use to justify your position. It doesn't matter what you say, you CAN do everything perfectly and still lose with the Talisman.
|
I never once said that having the Talisman guarantees victory. But, playing well (with fast expansion and such) combined with the Talisman does guarantee victory in most game situations (except when you get the other players to ally against you, which is nowhere near playing well at all, as diplomacy is a big part of a MP game). Playing well requires expanding faster than your neighbors and then being able to overwhelm them. Otherwise, it is not playing well, but at best playing adequately. Even expanding as fast as them means you will still most likely be able to win with the Talisman because all else being equal, the Talisman ships will win in combat. You just have to form your own alliance and not get them to gang up on you. If you expand slower than them, you are certainly not playing well.
There is a certain point of no return that once you reach, victory is pretty much guaranteed. The Talisman makes reaching this point a lot easier, as your ships are extremely overpowered in combat.
Quote:
What does the things you do have to do with whether the other players are going to gang up on you or not?
|
You can talk to them and use diplomacy to get some of them on your side. This prevents you from getting ganged up on by a bunch of enemies, as they will have to fight your allies too. So, if you make no effort to gather allies, you aren't playing the game very well, as no matter what, you will fall, talisman or no. Don't let them ally against you. Don't be an overly aggressive evil overlord, and you greatly increase your chances of not being seen as a huge threat. Now, if they still irrationally gang up on you and you never do anything in the game to threaten them, it is probably not a group of players you should play with again, as they are not interested in fair play, only winning at any cost.
|

July 14th, 2003, 10:54 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A thought on the Talisman / Live on Pay-Per-View: Geo vs. Fyron
[quote]Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Quote:
Now, if they still irrationally gang up on you and you never do anything in the game to threaten them, it is probably not a group of players you should play with again, as they are not interested in fair play, only winning at any cost.
|
If the talisman more or less guarantees a win for the talisman player unless his is ganged up on, it is not irrational to gang up on him. Nor is it "unfair" to do so - in fact, it should be expected.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|