|
|
|
|
 |

July 25th, 2003, 07:43 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
|
What I am saying is I like your goal, but not the method you choose to achieve that goal. The suggestions you had made up until this point had consisted mainly of minor data tweaks, which I don't believe is enough of a change to achieve balance.
|
In order to stand a chance of becoming the stock mod, minor data tweaks are all we can allow.
__________________
Things you want:
|

July 25th, 2003, 07:46 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by spoon:
I believe I am willing to accept that for most weapons, but the PPB is a menace, so I'm a little more adamant about it.
|
Ok, so what say you of my hairbrained scheme to remove the shield skipping ability from the PPB that I posted this morning? I am a little suprised noone has commented on it. Perhaps it is so bad it's not worth commenting on?
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

July 25th, 2003, 08:01 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
Ok, so what say you of my hairbrained scheme to remove the shield skipping ability from the PPB that I posted this morning? I am a little suprised noone has commented on it. Perhaps it is so bad it's not worth commenting on?
|
I think it has merit and is worth considering...
Maybe give the Skips Shields (unphased) ability to the Hellbore in exchange?
|

July 25th, 2003, 08:06 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
In order to stand a chance of becoming the stock mod, minor data tweaks are all we can allow.
|
Hmm, I think I should use a different wording. I understand we can only do data tweaks, and you don't want anything that would initiate a cascade of changes. What I meant was the level of tweaking should be greater in some instances.
For example, reducing the damage of the PPB by 10 across the board (I'm not suggesting this, though it might be worth considering) is what I would call a major change. Reducing the range at level 1 and 2 is a minor change.
Some weapons need a major change, I think.
|

July 25th, 2003, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 252
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
Any other comments on the Hellbores, Torpedoes and High energy weapons?
|
I think the previous suggestions on these weapons are very good.
I would just like to add my vote for extended range and a little more oomph (damage) for the torpedoes. It would be wonderful if they were a viable alternative to the beam weapons.
I think your idea about the PPB's, Geo, has exactly the right intent - it's the shield skipping ability that brings the PPB to "uberweapon" status. I'll bet PPB's would still be used anyway (it's got a good damage ratio), and it would restore shields as a good early game option. We could do away with phased shields, then, and have a more gradual build-up of shield points over the entire range of shield levels (instead of ignoring them until shields level six, you could get started right away).
I do understand the goal of making minimal changes, though, so the general reduction of PPB by 10 points across the board might be just enough to make the other weapons viable mid-game options.
Good luck with the mod, SJ, this is an excellent idea! 
|

July 25th, 2003, 08:42 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
Any other comments on the Hellbores, Torpedoes and High energy weapons?
|
It was suggested that the G.Hellbore could have range increased and ROF 2 instead of 3. I think ROF definitely should not change, because it would change the nature of the weapon, not just its effectiveness. GH should remain an ROF 3 weapon with short range and good short-range damage. It just needs to be effective in its niche, which it really isn't. Again, I think it should be either all-shield-skipping or armor-skipping (several mods do one or the other of these).
For torps and HE weapons, I still like my suggestions, and also like the recent ideas mentioned:
Torps having increased to-hit, damage, and cost. (right now they are quite cheap, especially at low levels)
The idea to increase WMG range is one I like. Currently it's +30 to-hit bonus does give it some value at range compared to APB, but it is really weak in terms of damage/ROF/size, so a range bonus would make it more unique and interesting.
PvK
|

July 25th, 2003, 08:45 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
Any other comments on the Hellbores, Torpedoes and High energy weapons?
|
I think part of the problem is it's hard to say what to do to these weapons until we know what you are going to do to the current main weapons (DUC, MB, PPB, APB) so we have something to balance them against.
You might want to start with deciding what to do specifically to the PPB (most people seem to want to do something), then balance the APB based on the new PPB. Then the MB. Then the DUC. (Might well be some of these will require no change at all...) And so on.
Then, after every weapon has been examined, go back and look at them again...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|