| 
 | 
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
    
 | 
       | 
      
 
 
	
		  | 
	
	 | 
 
 
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 29th, 2003, 10:44 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Dec 1999 
					
					
					
						Posts: 8,806
					 
					 
	Thanks: 54 
	
		
			
				Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		PD thoughts: 
 
For a simple balance mod, I don't think it's necessary to remove the existing interesting choice and trade-offs between PD ships and PD on every ship. 
 
Current suggestion: 
 
1) Use the new settings.txt entry for Seeker Defense Bonus to give seekers a chance to get through PD. I suggest about 60%, though this will get stomped by ships training and deploying Combat Sensors stacking with the PD bonus. Maybe for higher levels, the seeker damage resistance could be increased, and/or have the PDC damage taper off at range as Tesco mentioned. 
 
2) Increase the effect of Small ECM for fighters. The unmodded game has it at +10/+20/+30, which gets outstripped by ships with +65 Combat Sensors +20 Ship Training +20 Fleet Training. Ideally, fighter defenses would be able to keep up via research, perhaps by giving Afterburners a defense bonus, adding more ECM levels, increasing the ECM levels' effects, and/or adding other defensive components for fighters (e.g. stealth/scattering armor?). By adding stuff at the end of the tech tree, it won't make fighters dominate low-tech ships. However, for this mod, it's hard to add stuff without seeming to re-do things. Personally, to make up the +70 advantage of high-tech ships, I'd split the Troop and Fighter Versions of Small ECM (to avoid causing balance problems with troops), and then make fighter Small ECM give +20/+40/+60, and then give Afterburners +10/+20/+30 defense. 
 
PvK 
 
[Edit: TDM->Tesco] 
  
 [ July 29, 2003, 21:58: Message edited by: PvK ] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 29th, 2003, 11:25 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Oct 2001 
					Location: Toronto, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 5,624
					 
					 
	Thanks: 1 
	
		
			
				Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		4 days later and nothing is decided!  Ha Ha Ha!   
Some good ideas throughout, but who is going to start making some decisions? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 01:35 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
			
				
				
				 Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2001 
					Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 11,451
					 
					 
	Thanks: 1 
	
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Any more comments on Point Defense? or the Talisman? 
Would a significant defense penalty on the Talisman be a good idea? 
How about The Hyper-optics/Anti-cloak sensors? 
Perhaps a larger cost or size for non-racial sensors? 
How much should Climate Control Facilities be improved? 
What should be done with intel ops?
Summary
Unsorted Issues
 - Fighters & Missiles too weak / PDC to powerful
 
- Climate Control Facilities too weak
 
- Medical Lab plague prevention effect too low
 
- Talisman too powerful
 
- Quantum Reactors too powerful
 
- PDC, PPB too powerful
 
- Torpedoes, Graviton Hellbore, Incinerator, too weak.
 
- Ship Training too powerful
 
- Not enough room for Weapon Platforms
 
- High level Intel ops too effective
 
- All of the new damage types not used
 
- Fighter Rocket pods -> Seekers?
 
  
 Trivial Changes: 
 - Add redundant tech requirements to Standard armor allowing AIs to call for it in design creation.
 
- Reduce Price of Quantum reactor to benefit AI
 
- Separate Normal and Phased shields component family.  (Split them in terms of "Show only latest" and the upgrade button)
 
- Add ability descriptions for weapon to-hit bonuses
 
 
 Minor Changes: 
 - Smoothing of low level PPB improvements as below.
 
- Increase range of WMG & HEM to 10
 
- Reduce strength of Ground Cannon
 
- Reduce size of Supply Storage to 10kt.  Count supply storage as cargo area.
 
  
 Moderate Changes: 
 - Make standard Training Facilities System-wide for the benefit of AIs.  Psychic Trait Version trains 2x as fast to keep it worthwhile.
 
- Scale up damage of ROF 2 weapons
 
- Increase Planetary shield strength by 5x
 
- Graviton Hellbore changed to Skip All Shields
 
- Double Effect of Shield Regenerators
 
- Individual resource bonus facilities 50% more powerful than all-in-one facilities.
 
- Small CS/ECM doubled in effect to keep up with ship-CS/ECM.
 
- Small accuracy bonus for torpedoes (~10%)
 
- Small accuracy penalty for PPB (~10%)
 
 
 Suggestions of note: 
 - Phased Polaron Beam Average Adjustment
 
 
 code:
 Research Cost: 15k 
Weapon Damage At Rng := 30 25 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Weapon Damage At Rng := 35 30 30 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Weapon Damage At Rng := 45 40 40 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Weapon Damage At Rng := 50 45 45 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Weapon Damage At Rng := 60 55 55 55 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
  [/list]  
 [ July 30, 2003, 22:45: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Things you want: 
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 01:52 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				First Lieutenant 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Apr 2002 
					Location: California 
					
					
						Posts: 790
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		How small were you thinking for these two items: 
 
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				 - Small accuracy bonus for torpedoes 
 - small accuracy penalty for PPB
			
		 | 
	 
	 
  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 02:12 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
			
				
				
				 Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2001 
					Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 11,451
					 
					 
	Thanks: 1 
	
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Probably around 10% 
 
If anybody is strongly against any of the items, feel free to speak up. 
I'll run them all by Aaron before implementing it. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Things you want: 
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 02:34 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				First Lieutenant 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Apr 2002 
					Location: California 
					
					
						Posts: 790
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Originally posted by Suicide Junkie: 
Probably around 10% 
 
If anybody is strongly against any of the items, feel free to speak up. 
I'll run them all by Aaron before implementing it.
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 I really like the idea of making Training Facilities system wide (though that takes away one of the (likely unintended) benefits of choosing the None atmosphere type...)  In addition to that, though, I think the Max Level of training should be dropped to 10% or 15%...  That +40% is tough to overcome. 
 
For intel, if nothing else, I really think you should curb Comm Mimic and Food Contamination. 
 
For torpedoes, I'd increase the bonus to hit to more like 30% (and not change the amount of damage.) 
 
Everything else looks fine. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 04:17 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jan 2001 
					Location: Ohio 
					
					
						Posts: 8,450
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Originally posted by Suicide Junkie: 
Minor Changes:[list][*]Move Standard Armor to below Stealth, scattering and emissive , 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Didn't we determine this change would keep any savegames from being upgradeable? Not saying it shouldn't be done, but that might be a big issue for some. 
 
Geoschmo 
  
 [ July 30, 2003, 03:18: Message edited by: geoschmo ] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else  
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 04:46 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jul 2001 
					Location: Southern CA, USA 
					
					
						Posts: 18,394
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		That also might be an irrelevant issue for others. If savegames have to be made incompatible, then that should not be a stopping factor IMO. MM could include a "non-balanced" mod folder that people could use to play old games they want to keep playing in the patch... 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 05:31 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
			
				
				
				 Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2001 
					Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
					
					
						Posts: 11,451
					 
					 
	Thanks: 1 
	
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Almost any change will affect savegames.  I will email it all to Aaron to see what he likes. 
 
Only really big things like racial traits make the save unloadable... 
Moving components will make some saves unusable. 
Changing research costs would make some saves unfair. 
Only the most trivial changes will not affect savegames at all. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Things you want: 
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				July 30th, 2003, 08:54 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Brigadier General 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jul 2001 
					Location: Kiel, Germany 
					
					
						Posts: 1,896
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: SE4 Stock Balance Mod
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Originally posted by Imperator Fyron: 
... MM could include a "non-balanced" mod folder ...
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 well, I think "Classic" would be more appropriate here. 
 
Rollo 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | 
	
 
	| 
	
	
	
	 | 
	
 
	| Display Modes | 
	
 
	
	
	
	
		  Linear Mode 
		
		
	 
	
	 | 
	
	
 
 
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is On 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
     |  
 |