|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 13th, 2003, 11:46 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: NY 
						Posts: 794
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Mapping Sol 
 I was wondering, whats the most accurate map of the Solar System out there, as far as SEIV is concerned.
 Maybe we should get together and make a map of the Solar System in SEIV? It would be a one-system map, to be used as a template for any Map-Makers who would want it.
 
 Of course, this raises some problems.
 
 Should earth be a CO2, or an O2 planet(Technically its mostly CO2, but we use the O2, at least I think its mostly CO2).
 
 Should there be 8, 9, or 12 planets?
 
 How many moons should be included? Would Phobos and Deimos be included, or would they be considered asteroids?
 
 I would also suggest we leave the Warp-Points out. That would be for the Users to add themselves.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 13th, 2003, 11:51 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada 
						Posts: 5,624
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 
	Umm, Earth has about 70% Nitrogen, 23% Oxygen, and only a small % Carbon Dioxide - but since N is not a big factor for advanced life on the planet, I'd say go with O2.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Lord Kodos: I was wondering, whats the most accurate map of the Solar System out there, as far as SEIV is concerned.
 
 Maybe we should get together and make a map of the Solar System in SEIV? It would be a one-system map, to be used as a template for any Map-Makers who would want it.
 
 Of course, this raises some problems.
 
 Should earth be a CO2, or an O2 planet(Technically its mostly CO2, but we use the O2, at least I think its mostly CO2).
 
 Should there be 8, 9, or 12 planets?
 
 How many moons should be included? Would Phobos and Deimos be included, or would they be considered asteroids?
 
 I would also suggest we leave the Warp-Points out. That would be for the Users to add themselves.
 |  
 I'd go with 9 planets and only major moons.  That means ours, the 5 big moons around Jupiter, and a couple around Saturn (Titan and Mimas come to mind), Triton for Neptune, perhaps Miranda for Uranus, and Cheron for Pluto.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 13th, 2003, 11:57 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: NY 
						Posts: 794
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 Ill go with the flow, but I realy dont think we should include Pluto or Charon. Simply too small. The Moon is larger then them IIRC. And Varuna, Quaor, and Ceres are all just as large if not larger then Pluto as well, IIRC. See the article about Naming Contraversy someone posted here(sorry, dont remember who and I am too lazy to check at the moment! ^_^).
 And who would make the map anyway? Im suggesting it, but Im realy not familiar enough with the Solar System, and I also lack the patiance for SEIVs map editor.
 
 Of course, I realy like the idea, and if no one else does it, I will. I imagine ill even include it in LR mods extras.
 
 Moose. Moose. Moose.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 01:36 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CHEESE! 
						Posts: 10,009
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 the nitrogen is mostly a balancing agent so we don't have to much oxygen. 
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
Some of my webcomics.  I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 03:07 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 
	Where did you hear that?Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM: the nitrogen is mostly a balancing agent so we don't have to much oxygen.
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 03:18 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CHEESE! 
						Posts: 10,009
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 i think you said something like that. plus other places. 
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
Some of my webcomics.  I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 03:25 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 I think you are remembering a post wrong, as I never said that. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 03:31 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 Well, too high a partial pressure of oxygen -is- poisonous (same for carbon dioxide, actually). But I don't think I've read anything like Narf's statement. 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 03:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Ohio, USA 
						Posts: 4,323
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 Heh...
 Too much oxygen is poisonous because we've evolved in this atmosphere which is 70 percent+ nitrogen. A (nearly) pure oxygen atmosphere would not necessarily be impossible for life to exist in, though unlikely in 'real life' because free oxygen is chemically unstable. It's the presence of life that maintains the current percentage of oxygen in Earth's atmosphere now. It would all be soaked up in chemical compounds within a few million years without constant renewal by plants. Many simpler life forms on Earth today could handle a nearly pure oxygen atmosphere, though.
 
 It's much the same for CO2. We humans would die in an atmosphere of more than 4 or 5 percent CO2, as I recall. This is not a universal constant but simply a function of how human physiology turned out. Lots of simpler animals can handle more than 4 or 5 percent CO2.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 14th, 2003, 04:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada 
						Posts: 1,498
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mapping Sol 
 You want to map the sol system only??? Got 10 minutes to spare?  Now if you want to map the closest 100 systems that would be a really cool project!        (one I've thought about doing myself but that map editor         ... ) |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |