OT: And you thought the world was sane...

Tigbit · #1 August 24th, 2003, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:
Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Nobody! Go survival of the fittest!

We finally agree on something.

Fyron · #2 August 24th, 2003, 08:41 AM

Bound to happen eventually.

Suicide Junkie · #3 August 24th, 2003, 04:43 PM

City people should all get happyfluffypuppy dogs. Where the worst they do is slobber on you

DavidG · #4 August 25th, 2003, 04:35 AM

Yea whatever. So I guess all you guys (assume for a second you have kids) wouldn't mind if say your neighbour kept a half starved Tiger in his backyard and thought it was adequate safety to put up a "Warning Tiger!" sign on the gate.

Fyron · #5 August 25th, 2003, 05:03 AM

As long as he could keep it locked up, nope.

Tigbit · #6 August 25th, 2003, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavidG:
Yea whatever. So I guess all you guys (assume for a second you have kids) wouldn't mind if say your neighbour kept a half starved Tiger in his backyard and thought it was adequate safety to put up a "Warning Tiger!" sign on the gate.

Well, if the animal was half starved it would have to eat something.

Fyron · #7 August 25th, 2003, 05:24 AM

Of course, you have to keep in mind that tigers can most likely just leap over normal walls and fences, so he would have to have a much higher fence/wall (preferably a wall). As long as sufficient safety precautions are taken, it is not a problem.