|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 6th, 2003, 07:49 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2002 
						Posts: 2,903
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 Looks like the choice is pretty obvious!    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 6th, 2003, 11:41 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada 
						Posts: 3,227
					 Thanks: 7 
		
			
				Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 Did I vote? Hell Yeah, I voted.    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 7th, 2003, 01:33 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA 
						Posts: 3,499
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 There's no "I don't care" choice, so I abstained. 
				__________________ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2003, 02:21 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Irving, TX 
						Posts: 1,237
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2003, 02:36 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Virginia 
						Posts: 1,311
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 
	One third of responders to this poll.  There is no real way to establish that they really represent the opinions of one-third of the community (especially since this regards the Lurk Report, designed for the less-active participants).  Besides, by their own admission, they suck.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by mlmbd: It is 'now' one third. I can not ignore one third of the community.
 |   
 [ September 10, 2003, 13:37: Message edited by: General Woundwort ]
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 10th, 2003, 06:46 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 mlmbd, you are instead going to ignore 70% of the community?      I bet more than a third of the community doesn't Subscribe to the Frag newsletter. Do they stop doing it because of that? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 17th, 2003, 02:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Irving, TX 
						Posts: 1,237
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue? 
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |