PBW server is back up.

rextorres · #1 December 3rd, 2003, 08:37 PM

I would say that 300 - 500 "hardcore" players is not insignificant based on the total announced sales of the product. Again this is all based on conjecture.

[ December 03, 2003, 18:37: Message edited by: rextorres ]

geoschmo · #2 December 3rd, 2003, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rextorres:
I would say that 300 - 500 "hardcore" players is not insignificant based on the total announced sales of the product. Again this is all based on conjecture.

I didn't mean to imply it was insignificant.

Merely that it doesn't justify the level of direct financial support that some people seem to feel Shrapnel should be providing.

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Battle.net is paid for by Blizzard and charges no money to use it... all you have to do is have the game. Battle.net makes them money specifically because a lot of people buy their games to play on Battle.net. PBW can become something similar for SE4/SE5.

Which is a perfect example of the point I am trying to make. Blizzard games are not what one would classify as "niche" games. They have a much larger fan base which can support things like bettle.net through proceeds from retail sales. Shrapnel is a little fish compared to that.

Fyron · #3 December 3rd, 2003, 08:47 PM

Yes, and they would use little fish servers as opposed to the massive server farms used for Battle.net.

AMF · #4 December 3rd, 2003, 08:49 PM

First off, thanks again for all your great work setting up PBW.

Second, I can't help but think that charging people 1 $1/month for the privilege of using PBW is a good idea. Plus, I often find that people value that which they pay for more than that which is free. Ever worked in an office with an intern who worked for free and a paid employee who did less than the intern but got paid for it?

BTW, do you yet know why the connection is horked? (apologies if this has been asked, I didn't see it below).

Thanks,

Alarik

[ December 03, 2003, 18:59: Message edited by: alarikf ]

1FSTCAT · #5 December 3rd, 2003, 09:21 PM

Yeah!

What's your provider got to say, this time around?!

mottlee · #6 December 3rd, 2003, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1FSTCAT:
Yeah!

What's your provider got to say, this time around?!

Lets ALL go over there and, and, and

UNPLUG them!

geoschmo · #7 December 3rd, 2003, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by alarikf:
Second, I can't help but think that charging people 1 $1/month for the privilege of using PBW is a good idea. Plus, I often find that people value that which they pay for more than that which is free.

I am sure you are correct. If anyone wishes to give a dollar a month, we will happily accept it. We accept donations by Paypal and by mail.

The problem with pay for play is this. While it is highly likely that a sizeable portion of the regular Users would happily pay, there is a significant portion who won't, or can't. If we don't allow those people to play, then the people who do pay will get let use out of the service because there will not be as many people available to play against.

By working from donations, those that are able and willing to pay can, and they will get the maximum value for the money they give.

At least that's the way we see it.

Geoschmo