Should I buy it? Help me understand

[se5a]

Originally posted by JayBdey:
You'll find multiplayer in this game to be horribly painful to get working. And if you do get it working, playing the game is slow in multiplayer.

But if you do manage to get it working, it can be very fun.

I didnt have any problems at all - once I worked out what I was doing.
tcpip is a little confusing to do. but PBW is great.
if your playing by pbw however you need to play similtanios mode (which I think is better anyway)

[JayBdey]

PBW is horribly slow and can take days just to get started.

[Phoenix-D]

Originally posted by JayBdey:
PBW is horribly slow and can take days just to get started.

Or it can not. In TCP games you spend a lot of time waiting for other players to finish their turns anyway. PBW games, you don't exactly have that, and games can go just as fast as TCP assuming everyone stays at their computer and plays.

OTOH, PBW games quite easily can stretch over months, or more. But when you have 20 players involved, that's understandable, and the logistics of getting them all in one place for a TCP game would be..difficult to say the least.

[Argitoth]

in TCP/IP is there an autohost option? e.g. when all players have ended a turn, the turn is generated and the players can then take their next turns.

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
Originally posted by JayBdey:

OTOH, PBW games quite easily can stretch over months, or more. But when you have 20 players involved, that's understandable, and the logistics of getting them all in one place for a TCP game would be..difficult to say the least.

SpaceCon 2004! Space Empire fans from around the glob unite for the worlds largest lan party in world history. Hosted by Malfador, Shrapnel, and many many more.

I vote Portland OR.

[ December 02, 2003, 06:08: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

[Fyron]

Originally posted by JayBdey:
You'll find multiplayer in this game to be horribly painful to get working. And if you do get it working, playing the game is slow in multiplayer.

That is only true for TCP/IP, and only you do not know how to forward ports on a firewall. PBEM, which is how most MP games are played, is rather painless.

Originally posted by JayBdey:
PBW is horribly slow and can take days just to get started.

SE4 is not pretending to be a RTS game where each game is over with in hours, you know. You can very easily get face paced PBW games; just get a group of players willing to sit down all at one time to play them. They even go faster than TCP/IP (much faster in some cases) when you start getting more than 2 or 3 players in a game. This is because TCP/IP only sends the game files to one player at a time. PBEM/PBW allows the game files to be sent to all players at once, and the host only has to do a single upload, rather than one to every player. Check out the PBW Real-time Client if you want even faster retrieval of turns.

Originally posted by Argitoth:
in TCP/IP is there an autohost option? e.g. when all players have ended a turn, the turn is generated and the players can then take their next turns.

No. The turn only processes when the host hits the execute next turn button. This has both its advantages and its disadvantages.

[ December 02, 2003, 06:56: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]

[Argitoth]

Arrr!! Now I want to buy it. I have enough money and everything, but... I'm scared!


Can you tell me how battles work? (in Web-games)

[ December 02, 2003, 08:13: Message edited by: Argitoth ]