|
|
|
|
 |

December 19th, 2003, 08:59 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
Damage is not assigned per point. All the damage from a shot is assigned to the same component, unless it gets destroyed. Then, the extra gets applied to a new single component.
Trust SJ. He is quite right on this.
[ December 19, 2003, 06:59: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|

December 19th, 2003, 09:12 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
quote: If this bug is fixed in future, its value increases significantly.
|
It is not a bug, it is how the combat mechanics were designed. Then it is designed poorly and should be fixed. It is not logical that enemy would 99 % of the combats hit first that same armor (expect with talisman and that only guarantees that you hit the ship, not one specific component in that ship).
__________________
If you give a man a fish, he will eat a day;
But if you teach a man to fish, he will buy an ugly hat;
And if you talk about a fish to a starving man, then you're a consultant
|

December 19th, 2003, 09:56 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
If that one armor component has a lot fewer hit points than the other armor components, it makes sense. It is the weakest part, so why not target it first?
I should also point out that the armor systems are bound to be integrated somehow, so the weakest part is likely to fail first, not Last. It makes 0 sense to say that one chunk of the hull is CA, one is EA. If that were the case, then the EA ability would not be in effect when CA gets hit, but it is. Given that, whatever the EA is doing is always getting hit and worn down, so it would be more likely to fail first.
[ December 19, 2003, 08:01: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|

December 20th, 2003, 02:26 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
I don't think MM can change anything here. He would have to allocate variables to store damage to individual components instead of just one per ship. Now, if you have 20+ components per each ship, memory requirement and processing time will go through the roof in the late game battles. I would rather leave it as it is than to have SEIV run on ultra fancy computers only !
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

December 19th, 2003, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
It's logical that EA is destroyed first. In stock game it's bigger than standard armor, less durable and in order to reflect energy back to space it have to be located in the ship's outermost layer.
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Trust SJ. He is quite right on this.
|
I can't see anybody disagreeing with him on this. I just tried to explain why the heavy pseudo armor is better than the light even if the light has more hit points. Cyrien explained excellently what I tried to say.
__________________
'The surest sign that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.' Calvin and Hobbes
Are you tough enough to be the King of the Hill?
|

December 19th, 2003, 08:02 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
EA is actually destroyed (usually) Last when using standard armor, cause it has more hit points...
|

December 19th, 2003, 08:25 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Emissive Armor?
...right... so it's not logical then. 
__________________
'The surest sign that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.' Calvin and Hobbes
Are you tough enough to be the King of the Hill?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|