Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad

Atrocities · #1 January 8th, 2004, 08:51 PM

Call of Duty is a darn good game. Thanks for mentioning it David.

Fyron · #2 January 8th, 2004, 09:58 PM

Hmm... do expansions count?

Atrocities · #3 January 8th, 2004, 10:05 PM

Sure they do.

Fyron · #4 January 8th, 2004, 10:07 PM

I think Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark came out recently, so that would get my vote for best game of 03.

Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.

Loser · #5 January 8th, 2004, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.

Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.

[edit: 2 != 3]

[ January 08, 2004, 20:28: Message edited by: Loser ]

Gryphin · #6 January 9th, 2004, 02:02 AM

Best Game Empire Deluxe Internet Editon

I don't have a worst game because I have only played SEIV and EDIE.

Fyron · #7 January 9th, 2004, 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loser:

quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.

Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.

[edit: 2 != 3]

So? There are a lot of horrid games that are "playable." And besides, part of the problem with Civ 3 is the evil marketing BS they pulled with it, splitting the game into 3 parts so they could milk more money without adding ANY meaningful features in any of the expansions. Civ 3 + 2 expansions at their best almost equal Civ 2 Gold at its worst, save some really stupid things like removing the hit point/firepower system of Civ 2 that helped tremendously over Civ 1. No comparison at all to Civ 2 ToT.