|
|
|
|
 |
February 26th, 2004, 08:08 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
Patch it.
Time to start thinking of AI:s ??
[ February 26, 2004, 06:14: Message edited by: Ruatha ]
|
February 27th, 2004, 02:34 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
Patching it, already sent a message to GeoSchmo asking him to set it to 1.91....
I'll start the game tonight or tomorrow. 17 players should be fine, no?
Do y'all want me to throw in AIs to fill up the Last few spots?
thanks,
Alarik
Quote:
Originally posted by Ruatha:
Patch it.
Time to start thinking of AI:s ??
|
|
February 26th, 2004, 03:57 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
I'm not much for AI's in PBW games, but if you really want to you can... 17 is close enough to 20. 
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|
February 26th, 2004, 03:59 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
I concur. Unless someone wants 3 AIs in the game, let's just go with all human players...
as soon as I can get home I'll send in my EMPire and, then we're just waiting on any others who have yet to do the same...
thanks,
alarik
Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Kolis:
I'm not much for AI's in PBW games, but if you really want to you can... 17 is close enough to 20.
|
|
February 26th, 2004, 05:33 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
I don't want Ai's either.
Just thought the map might be created with 19+1 defined starting positions, making 16+1 players unbalancing it.
But if you can keep them out, as it seems, I'm happy!  |
February 26th, 2004, 05:39 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
Ooops, seems I scared away one player in the game forum!
I mixed up this forum with the NGC4 one, was using multiple browser tabs...
Really sorry, I'll mail him and explain!
|
February 26th, 2004, 06:06 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ZQNN (Zeta Quadrant News Network) - Replacement Player needed
Hey, you're scary, eh?
Anyways, just one small question to put out there for someone to step up to the plate to confirm: people have made their EMPires under 1.84. The game is gonna be 1.91 now. I am assuming that this won;t be a problem. Worst case scenario, I'll keep the game as 1.84 until the first turn is run, then switch it to 1.91.
Like I said...we start as soon as everyone gets their EMPires in!
Tonight!!?
Thanks,
Alarik
Quote:
Originally posted by Ruatha:
Ooops, seems I scared away one player in the game forum!
I mixed up this forum with the NGC4 one, was using multiple browser tabs...
Really sorry, I'll mail him and explain!
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
