|
|
|
 |

April 17th, 2004, 11:56 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
Well, point is, as the brgs are soemtimes out there asimilating their fellow races, they should be some sort of advanced. therefore a small or normal ringworld woud fit fantastic for them, compensating for the lack of treaties and the adding to the fact that they are more( in trek tv much more advanced) than any other race.
__________________
Number One! Red Alert, shields up and please escort Ensign Crusher to airlock 21, without a spacesuit!
|

April 17th, 2004, 12:53 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
Hi,
I agree with Blackrose and Heretic, but a medium sized Ringworld would be to much for the 3 minors surrounding the Borg.
And don't forget that 8472 was evenly advanced as the Borg, so we should give 8472 also an advantage. But do due to the game-engine such an advantage would be disastrous for the normal-majors in the alpha quadrant (I'm probalbly the first to encounter 8472 and the Borg, after the fleeing Hirogen  )
So here is my Decision/proposal:
Borg : small Ringworld
8472 : Huge Planet
Dominion : Huge Planet
In this way their should be a possibility for the alpha-quadrant to survive the raging hordes from Delta and Gamma.
Intimidator,
Everybody who disagrees : please shoot (me)!!
[ April 17, 2004, 11:53: Message edited by: Intimidator ]
|

April 17th, 2004, 12:58 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
Aiken : No i will not drop the Nausicaan.
I will create 2 more minors: the Nausicaan (Next to the Gorn) and the Ktarians(up north, but in alpha).
I will control the both of them for the first 2 turns, after that will let the AI handle them.
But hopefully there will be humans to take it over within 3 turns.
Intimidator,
|

April 17th, 2004, 12:59 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
I will shoot anybody who will be disagree, at least with the point concerning 8472
Brilliant idea. I like it. Alot.
[ April 17, 2004, 12:01: Message edited by: aiken ]
|

April 18th, 2004, 01:03 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
Yes offcourse you like it, I just gave you a larger planet !! 
|

April 18th, 2004, 01:08 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
BTW. Aiken: your 3 extra Intell ops please ??
(I think I forgot them again)
Inti,
|

April 18th, 2004, 01:29 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek, Quadrants of Conflict
i like it even better intimidator! Much larger planet than those itty bitty 8472er goons!!!!!
Ralf is laughing at me, perhaps all of you will grant me right of passage so that those federation redshirts will get what they deserve!
__________________
Number One! Red Alert, shields up and please escort Ensign Crusher to airlock 21, without a spacesuit!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|