|
|
|
 |

April 26th, 2004, 07:57 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
About the rules, I would indeed prefer a limit of two atmospheres, and at least a Medium tech cost. If a vote was needed, I would favour a High tech cost, but I do not mind much either way, so long as I can actually survive... well, twenty turns or even thirty!
|

April 27th, 2004, 09:40 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Baron Grazic:
quote: Originally posted by Asmala:
And I was just going to take Alneyan... Anyway, I'll choose Baron Grazic then.
|
After the first battle results in the Pairs game, I'm surprised Asmala even considered me, unless he can see the trap that I have laid down for him.
I can't refuse this honor - Thanks Asmala. Your ships were obsolete so I knew I'd win the battle. Light cruisers with APB 7 and normal shields can't beat battleships and dreadnoughts with PPB 5 and special armors. Your fleet had time to inflict considerable damage before being destroyed, though.
I don't care whether it's high or medium tech cost, but I like very much about that two atmosphere limit (though after meeting enemy and capturing some population it could be four different atmospheres...)
__________________
'The surest sign that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.' Calvin and Hobbes
Are you tough enough to be the King of the Hill?
|

April 28th, 2004, 02:03 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
If Joachim is interested we'd like to draft him.
Also:
As far as the rules I am game for anything.
|
For sure! It would be an honour.
Happy with what ever rules are agreed on.
|

April 28th, 2004, 02:43 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Welcome aboard, Joachim!
Then, concerning atmosphere and tech, how about this: (1) 2 atmospheres per team and high tech cost or (2) 1 atmosphere per team and medium tech cost?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 28th, 2004, 03:01 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I have no preferences either way, so I'll cast my vote with my Admiral.
|

April 28th, 2004, 04:04 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Welcome aboard, Joachim!
Then, concerning atmosphere and tech, how about this: (1) 2 atmospheres per team and high tech cost or (2) 1 atmosphere per team and medium tech cost?
|
I vote for option (2), just for the sake of minimizing micromanagement.
|

April 29th, 2004, 02:55 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I have no preference. What ever the Commander & Chief prefers.
__________________
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, BUT Laziness Always Pays Off Now.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|