PBW: New Game Star Trek Final Frontier IV

[Atrocities]

Looks like it just might be the four of us playing. Three more days until the dead line.

I need everyones YES or NO on these:

1. 3 Planet Start
2. Low tech Start
3. Low Tech Cost
4. No Intel Or
4a. Have intel but no sabotage)
4b. Have complete intel
5. No Fighters - just support craft
6. WMD ok

Also what kind of map do you all want to use?

[Captain Kwok]

My votes:

1. 3 planet start - YES
2. Low Tech start - NO (Medium)
3. Low Tech cost - NO (High)
4a. Espionage Intel - YES
4b. Sabotage Intel - NO
5. Fighters - YES (At least as an option)
6. Stellar Manipulation - Can it be set so that allows planet destroying, but not star destruction?

BTW, is the problem with remote mining fixed? Or does it at least decrease the value of asteroids?

[ April 26, 2004, 15:58: Message edited by: Captain Kwok ]

[userx]

Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
My votes:

1. 3 planet start - YES
2. Low Tech start - NO (Medium)
3. Low Tech cost - NO (High)
4a. Espionage Intel - YES
4b. Sabotage Intel - NO
5. Fighters - YES (At least as an option)
6. Stellar Manipulation - Can it be set so that allows planet destroying, but not star destruction?

BTW, is the problem with remote mining fixed? Or does it at least decrease the value of asteroids?

Agree with everything except I would prefer 1 planet start especialy if we use my Star Trek Map but I'll be happy with majorety rule.

Also, would like Minor races... it's nice to have friend or two when the Klingons and Romulans are attacking you.

Speaking of the Star Trek map, it's done but this is looking more and more like a 4 player game ... maybe I should modify it more for 3 or 4 player game.

[userx]

What about playing more than one race each?

[Captain Kwok]

Originally posted by userx:
What about playing more than one race each?

That'd be out of the question. It's too easy to exchange techs and stuff of that sort.

[Atrocities]

UserX is having PC issues and will be OFF-LINE for a while.

[Tnarg]

Originally posted by userx:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
My votes:

1. 3 planet start - YES
2. Low Tech start - NO (Medium)
3. Low Tech cost - NO (High)
4a. Espionage Intel - YES
4b. Sabotage Intel - NO
5. Fighters - YES (At least as an option)
6. Stellar Manipulation - Can it be set so that allows planet destroying, but not star destruction?

BTW, is the problem with remote mining fixed? Or does it at least decrease the value of asteroids?

Agree with everything except I would prefer 1 planet start especialy if we use my Star Trek Map but I'll be happy with majorety rule.

Also, would like Minor races... it's nice to have friend or two when the Klingons and Romulans are attacking you.

Speaking of the Star Trek map, it's done but this is looking more and more like a 4 player game ... maybe I should modify it more for 3 or 4 player game.

---

I also agree with userx, One planet start please, everything else is good.