OT: The Passion of the Christ movie

Atrocities · #1 May 24th, 2004, 12:29 AM

I believe that you are mistaken regarding the Patriot Act.

All I wanted to know is what any of your statement had to do with the current dicussion. Now I know. Thanks.

And It was Clinton / Gore who were the true anti christs.

[ May 23, 2004, 23:35: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

Azselendor · #2 May 24th, 2004, 02:53 AM

Atrocities, take a visit to an immigration court or even the jail if you can get a tour of one.

I took an offer once to view a homeland security immigration jail and I was stunned by the cruel mistreatment of not just immigrants, but to naturalized citizens and war veterans who were being held in jail without access to a lawyer or a fair trial or even proper sanitation.

Atrocities · #3 May 24th, 2004, 03:00 AM

I don't know what to say to your post. I honestly pray that no person is being wrongfully held, and or mistreated.

If they are, then hell yes we need a way to litigate their freedom.

Sometimes the idology of better safe than sorry has a human cost that is more often than not over looked.

I wish them all well.

Fyron · #4 May 24th, 2004, 06:35 AM

Bush is just following in the footsteps of people like FDR...

Yef · #5 May 25th, 2004, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by aiken:
In spite of 2000 years of Christianity, the same people who crucified him still rule our world. He would be in a great sorrow if he known that. [/QB]

And what is that suppossed to mean?

There were two people involved in Mr J cruxificion, the Romans and the Jews, and the Romans are no more, so it obviously means that the Jews rule the world!
Very nice. That's why I'll never see that awful movie. People comes out of the theater with an slightly diferent view of the world.
Brainwashing at its best. (or worst)

Aiken · #6 May 24th, 2004, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yef:

quote:
Originally posted by aiken:
In spite of 2000 years of Christianity, the same people who crucified him still rule our world. He would be in a great sorrow if he known that.

And what is that suppossed to mean?

There were two people involved in Mr J cruxificion, the Romans and the Jews, and the Romans are no more, so it obviously means that the Jews rule the world!
Very nice. That's why I'll never see that awful movie. People comes out of the theater with an slightly diferent view of the world.
Brainwashing at its best. (or worst) [/QB]

It's supposed to mean that mankind the same horde of barbarians as it was 2k years ago, inspite of the civilization, technical progress and such.

And it was your deduction about Jews, not mine - everybody see what he wants to see. I can't see anything wrong about jews in this film, sorry.

And I wonder how anybody can judge the film/picture/book without seing/reading it

narf poit chez BOOM · #7 May 24th, 2004, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Grauzone:

quote:
Originally posted by Atrocities:
And what does any of this have to do with the current discussion?

sounds archaic. like old testament. burn the sinners. death to all enemies. erase the unbeleavers. interesting law

I can recall no instance of 'erase the unbelievers' without human sacrifice being involved. Nor were sinners burnt, that I recall. And the death penalty was only mandatory for adultry and first degree murder.

Compared with other historical law's of the time, I would call Isreal's ancient laws enlightened.