|
|
|
 |

June 6th, 2004, 07:14 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
 . Quite right. I thought Evil Empire was when you owned most of the map. Is it 300% of 2nd or something?.
Do I have to repost the thread in General Forum, or will a Moderator do it?.
|

June 6th, 2004, 05:47 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
How many in the general forum would really understand what has already been posted, though?
MEE?
The important distiction between Military Alliance and Partnership?
Player quitting?
__________________
Things you want:
|

June 7th, 2004, 06:08 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Thats why I was worried by Atrocities suggestion. I couldn't see why people outside the game would, or could, compare SE4 to real life. I jumped to the conclusion he was thinking of the political environment. I have been thinking even people outside the game could do something like discuss what "Rank" countries are.
|

June 11th, 2004, 12:45 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
I guess we (New Zealand) would be partnership with you ausys, maybe T&R or military with ameraca hard to tell with our silly anti nuklear policy...
I dont realy keep up to date with RL treatys, politics and stuff.
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

June 11th, 2004, 03:18 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
I thought Kiwi Land pulled out of ANZUS 10 years ago, so you would have no military alliance with the US. I think there might be a treaty between us though. The problem is also that (I think) New Zealand has about 2 patrol boats as a navy, and you scrapped all your fighters so you have practically no air force. I used to be worried that Australia was at risk from Indonesia, but have learnt they might have 10 times the troops but they wouldn't stand a chance as our airforce is by far superior to any potential threat. Plus of course at the first sign of trouble we would go crying to the US to save us  .
|

June 11th, 2004, 10:10 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
phhht no our navy is a bit better than that, infact our navy has newer aircraft (hellys) than our practicaly nonexsistant airforce...
stupid govit, throwing away our skyhawks...
they might have been old - but hell, they were the BEST skyhawks out there with all the upgrades we did to them.
still, our SAS is meant to be one of the best isint it?
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

June 12th, 2004, 05:39 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Quote:
Originally posted by se5a:
they were the BEST skyhawks out there with all the upgrades we did to them.
|
I know the feeling. We still use F-111's, although we upgrade them every decade. We'll be using them for another 10 years at least, when they'll be about 60 (Like flying spitfires or Mustangs in the first Gulf War). Mind you I think we'll be getting some Raptors in a few years.
Edit: I remember when the Iran-Iraq war was "The Gulf War". Then we had kuwait, then Iraq again.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|