TDM vs AIC?

[Grand Lord Vito]

Your modest JLS.
AIC has not been out as long as TDM but I also have had sleepless nights and some of us players have loged few sick days from work when playing AI Campaign. It is extremely addictive. What Oleg says true. AIC is a game that demands you to use the stuff Aaron packed in se4 to build your infrastructure and economy up in order to win. The AI designs are perfect and the se4 AI Diplomacy in AIC is second to none.

With all the AIC multiplier options, AIC is very WORTHY of multiplier. JLS what are you talking about when you say AIC is unworthy of turn based movement game? IMHO AIC is the same in a turn based movement game as it is in simu play.

[ June 09, 2004, 12:36: Message edited by: Grand Lord Vito ]

[JLS]

(turn based movement game?)
True. I should edit this: early non-Tactical Combat. It gets kind of frustrating with everybody trying to land a hit, early in the game - with any low level AIC direct fire weapons…

===
With the true regard to multiplayer - no, AIC is not equipped, it has the foundations; however, I have yet to complete this. Look beyond anything else if you would for a moment - In PBW or PBM, play continues just fine - until somebody DROPS OUT. IF the replacement AI is unable to Complete the designs and also to contain a (pre) Tactical arrangement of scripts - designed for a sudden combative situation (or not), and have an AI that has the acceptable Political persona of the Player that dropped out; then, this PBW or PBM hosted game is usually placed on hold. If no one volunteers to carry the Banner of Standard of that dropped out player; this game may continue, and if so - then only at that AI replacement players devises…

TDM - fully representing stock se4. Can achieve a FANTASTIC AI replacement with PBW or PBM.

[ June 09, 2004, 15:14: Message edited by: JLS ]