|
|
|
 |

February 3rd, 2004, 01:14 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
I would think that the systems administrator for Shrapnel and people that have been visiting these forums a lot for years would have a more accurate feel for what the majority might think on an issue like this.
|

February 3rd, 2004, 01:16 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
|

February 3rd, 2004, 01:34 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
I also like the newest first format.
Although it might be more due to the fact that I visit several times a day so I already know what most threads contain.
|

February 3rd, 2004, 01:39 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
I would think that the systems administrator for Shrapnel and people that have been visiting these forums a lot for years would have a more accurate feel for what the majority might think on an issue like this.
|
The "people who have been visiting these forums for years" are a self selected sample, how many people do you think didn't like it and never returned?
The "Printer-friendly" option is not optimal as it forces you to download the message again, increasing the tedium for us dialup cripples.
Otherwise, remembering the failed upgrade of the board software just after Dom2 came out, does anyone know if he plans to try again?
|

February 3rd, 2004, 01:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
Quote:
Originally posted by aldiss2:
The "people who have been visiting these forums for years" are a self selected sample, how many people do you think didn't like it and never returned?
|
Not very many. Most people that have come to these forums over the years have not been so fickle as to leave just because they did not like the sorting order. The content is what matters, not the sorting order.
Quote:
The "Printer-friendly" option is not optimal as it forces you to download the message again, increasing the tedium for us dialup cripples.
|
True, but it is an option.
Quote:
Otherwise, remembering the failed upgrade of the board software just after Dom2 came out, does anyone know if he plans to try again?
|
The only thing that failed was getting the uploading script to work with the new forum script upgrade. Nothing else was a failure there.
Also, there is always the "end" key that will move the page to the bottom, preventing any doubled scrolling efforts at all. Doing this as well as using the Jump to New Posts link on every single thread page, helps a lot.
[ February 02, 2004, 23:47: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|

February 3rd, 2004, 02:34 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
Sorry but the sorting order does matter.
I think most people would prefer the traditional newest Last. I say this with a lot of confidence based on the fact that no other board I have ever visited has a default sorting order of newest first.
I think the ideal solution would be to let the user select his/her preference in the my profile section.
olaf
|

February 3rd, 2004, 02:38 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Posts are backwards why?
Yes, that would be the ideal solution. But, most people here on Shrapnel do not share your views that it is horrible and that it is even relevant. The content is much more important than the sorting order. You may not like the reasons for it, but others do. The common way not always the best way. There are other forums out there that sort Posts in newest to oldest order. Most of the better forum software packages support sorting in both orders.
[ February 03, 2004, 00:39: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|