Favorite wargame?

nikb · #1 January 6th, 2000, 08:49 AM

Here is another one that I played alot and can't remember the name...

You had generic blue and red forces with tanks and other material such as cannon. Tanks were light, medium and heavy and it took various amounts of damage to destroy them. When destroyed it left little blobs of metal on the landscape. I used to play this one until I think I started dreaming about how to win each scenario.

It was a reasonably shallow game...but...boy it was fun. Any idea what the name was? Makes me want to go and see if I can find the disks...well until H&M and WDK2K turn up.

I also liked V for Victory series such as Market Garden (name again) by Atomic.

What are your least liked games?

Cheers
Nik

[This message has been edited by nikb (edited 06 January 2000).]

Tim Brooks · #2 January 7th, 2000, 03:00 AM

I remember playing an SSI game called Gettysburg: The Turning Point. I used to play this game until my eyes crossed. You couldn't tear me away from it. Awesome. Horse & Musket reminds me of this game quite a bit.

reimero · #3 January 8th, 2000, 04:31 PM

Well, since you asked, the game I liked least was Three-Sixty's Patriot. Man, that game was awful!!! I was sooo looking forward to playing it after playing Harpoon, which was very well done, and it was the pits! The learning curve was steep, the graphics were poor, confusing and cheap, and the realism seemed to be... lacking.

On a related note, the game that got me excited about the possibilities of computer wargaming was Harpoon, which I first saw on an Amiga in Europe. The graphics weren't the most spectacular, but since the designers knew graphics would be hard, they made the interface look like a radar display. It does a great job with FOW (even throwing in fishing trawlers and news helecopters you need to ID.) Actually, I still think it's one of the better-done wargames out there, especially of those designed for DOS. But because the graphics are less than intensive (but by no means crappy - the map modelling is very well done) it means that the game is using even more realistic data and weapons behave as one would expect. I still have it and would play a lot more frequently if I could find a DOS driver for my mouse

WendellM · #4 January 15th, 2000, 09:37 PM

"Well, since you asked, the game I liked least was Three-Sixty's Patriot"

I never played Patriot, but I had similar high hopes for Wargasm. That game's graphics are awesome, but the unit control is terrible. When I play TacOps, I visualize Wargasm - maybe DiD (if DiD is still in business) could sell the engine to Major H! On the other hand, HnM's graphics are my idea of functionality. The icons have more men if the unit is larger, and you can see all the units' disruption or morale numerically at a glance (an improvement over Dragoon, though I prefer that game's sharper unit icons over the newer ones which are smoother, but seem a bit "out of focus," at least in the demo).

Wendell

[This message has been edited by WendellM (edited 15 January 2000).]

nikb · #5 October 24th, 2000, 08:38 PM

In the weekend I fluked a site where you can download old games. I fell upon Perfect General II (it was PG I that I had previously played to death).

Downloaded the beauty and got stuck into the game play.

Wow...its funny how things date and badly at that. It wasn't just the graphics that had dated, it was alot of the actual game play. Now I'm scarred, its ruined a fond memory I have had since the mid 20's.

You tend to forget how things advance over so short of time. I think that game was only put out in the mid 90's. Hell, I would hate to see some of the older games I was playing in the late 80's and thought were super techno games.

I was going to see if I could crank up Tanks - but I do not won't to ruin that memory. I cherish those days!

Nik

Trekkie · #6 May 27th, 2001, 09:31 AM

My favourite war game has got to be Command and Conquer: Tiberian Sun, Firestorm! I love the storyline. It isn't just 'shoot everything in sight', it's 'target this... and this... then capture this...' which is what I like about it. I can create strategies and battle plans other than 'get the biggest gun there is and bLast the enemy into oblivion.'

------------------
Visit Pogimon Central at www.angelfire.com/tv2/pogimon and its companion site, www.geocities.com/mewtwo_alex !
(Trust me, I'm a Trekkie!)

VampiricDread · #7 May 28th, 2001, 01:27 AM

Well, that's a difficult question on wargaming. If you're talking about the non-computerized, but cardboarded Versions, I like the ones I've designed (some of them published at a local newspaper long, long ago), some still waiting in the shelf, plus a number of others for entirely different reasons, namely: Starship Troopers (AH), StarForce (SPI), Squad Leader (AH), and Silent Death (ICE). Not to mention Third Reich (AH), The Arab-Israeli Wars (AH), and others...

Computer-wise, I think the offer has surpassed the pockets and available time for most of common mortals: I recall some oldies in different areas of gaming, though I think the Command & Conquer series set a standard and a place for them. PURE wargaming, which is a very difficult thing to define in the times we now live in, is open to discussion.

------------------
I wish I had more time to adventure...

[This message has been edited by VampiricDread (edited 28 May 2001).]

[This message has been edited by VampiricDread (edited 28 May 2001).]