|
|
|
 |

October 14th, 2003, 10:47 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Maelstrom, that post is seriously over the line. This is not the place for personal attacks. Please keep things civil from here on out.
|

October 14th, 2003, 10:49 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Quote:
Originally posted by Maelstorm:
quote: Originally posted by Taqwus:
Strong AI doesn't exist yet. What one can get now is some degree of function-fitting; but that presumes you know the structure of your inputs and outputs. The much-hyped neural network, for instance, needs to be given a set of inputs, and needs to be told what output to learn. Genetic programming methods need a vocabulary of operators, plus inputs to operate on them. Pick an input set that doesn't work, or don't include the flexibility necessary to fit your output, and it'll fail; have too much, and perhaps your search will trend towards getting stuck in meaningless local minima. It's not a coincidence that many games prefer to have fixed scenarios with pre-written scripts for AIs that also get vastly superior starting configurations... and most games have far fewer tactical choices than Dominions.
|
You are a fool. You have no idea about scripting. He didn't say that much about scripting... In fact, because his Posts are much more imformative than yours, I think that he knows quite a bit more about scripting than you. I am not commenting on that 'Evolving AI' -stuff, mainly because I am not sure did I understand it. But if you meant THAT as a scripting he has no idea about, I quess that you are a total fool. I would like to say troll, but I'm afraid they would come to eat me if they heard me say so...
[ October 14, 2003, 21:52: Message edited by: Endoperez ]
|

October 14th, 2003, 10:57 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 883
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
The only acceptable way of calling another man fool is in the context of a Mr.T reference. For example: I pity the fool that thinks the dominions AI can be improved.
|

October 14th, 2003, 11:16 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Quote:
Originally posted by Maelstorm:
quote: Reasoned post by Taqwus snipped.
|
You are a fool. You have no idea about scripting.[/qb] Actually he gave a concise and accurate report of the current state of AI, and clearly has some experience with it. On the other hand, you have giving nothing to support your purile view.
[ October 14, 2003, 22:18: Message edited by: Jasper ]
|

October 14th, 2003, 11:33 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Quote:
Originally posted by johan osterman:
For example: I pity the fool that thinks the dominions AI can be improved.
|
Huh??? 
|

October 15th, 2003, 12:33 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
|

October 15th, 2003, 12:55 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Urban Wilderness
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
For the T ignorant among you:
Mr. T vs Everything
Enough of this Jibba Jabba! All you forum foo's are crazier than Murdoch!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|