Re: yeah, but what about the manual?
I was thinking (and yes, it hurts sometimes).....
Will the Doms II manual provide more info about the mechanics of the game than the Dom I manual did? I realize that there is a lot of things going on and possible scenarios to work out, but I would rather see some of those explained, than the spell manual. Seeing that all the spell descriptions are listed in the game anyway, I find it a bit superfluous, while some other things are sorely missing.
For example, there was a recently mentioned thing about knights using their lances only in their first attack, and fighting with shorter weapons later on. The stream of questions stemming from that single fact can be quite substantial (which other units also use this rule, what is meant by "first attack" anyway, etc.). It seems that a lot of vets were also surprised by this notion. Why are things like these left out from the manual? If the current verison of the manual is in print and impossible to change now, can we expect any additions to it that would cover more of the game intricate mechanics?
Thanks for replies
|