Bezerking units

Psitticine · #1 November 14th, 2003, 09:50 PM

I once lost my pretender because he went beserk and refused to retreat with the rest of his army. He caused some damage before he went down, but, in the end, go down he did.

Definitely a trade-off, beserking is. I happen to like it, but I don't think it is overpowered at all.

licker · #2 November 14th, 2003, 09:57 PM

I accept that its a trade off, just that it seems strange to conquer a province with no commanders, that was my only real 'gripe' if you even want to call it that.

HJ · #3 November 14th, 2003, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by licker:
I accept that its a trade off, just that it seems strange to conquer a province with no commanders, that was my only real 'gripe' if you even want to call it that.

Well, you can also look at it in a way that you need to get commanders there after a conquest like that, otherwise your troops may rout upon contact in counterattack (yes, I know you can buy defense and all that, but you won't be able to position them nicely and script orders in the next turn). So, another tradeoff I guess.

[ November 14, 2003, 20:03: Message edited by: HJ ]