|
|
|
 |

January 10th, 2004, 08:32 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Berlin
Posts: 300
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Two involuntary turns, myself.
But no big loss.
__________________
Shut your mouth, it could open your mind! - from Skyclad's On With Their Heads!
|

January 10th, 2004, 08:47 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
I decided to be true to the tricky Vanhiem ways and not do anything until the time was right.
or
I had 2 server related stale turns and 5ish my own connection related stale turns.
They were my fault and I dont expect anyone else to take any. Just count me out of the accounting of turns.
[ January 10, 2004, 18:48: Message edited by: Wazooking ]
|

January 10th, 2004, 08:50 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Quote:
Originally posted by SurvivalistMerc:
Sabercherry,
I am actually hoping I don't end up a Jotun Neighbor.
|
What do you mean you don't want to be Jotun's neighbour? Jotunheim feels offended...
Quote:
Originally posted by SurvivalistMerc:
But it's easy to see why Jotunheim is so powerful...look at who has had all the mercs. My guess is they were able to take one of those tough heavy cav/knight provinces early on and just has more gold than we do.
|
You're absolutely right, if you mean those puny humans in their tin cans on their little ponies who fancied themself mighty warriors.
Quote:
Originally posted by SurvivalistMerc:
One involuntary turn here, by the way.
|
One voluntary stale turn here, no involuntary.
|

January 10th, 2004, 09:21 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
What alexti means to say is that after I said that and looked at the results of the turn...Jotunheim ended up as my neighbor.
Now to do some more reading about "curse."
|

January 11th, 2004, 03:11 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
One involuntary stale turn, no voluntary. I'll take one voluntarily if it's necessary.
|

January 11th, 2004, 03:21 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Quote:
Originally posted by Hana:
One involuntary stale turn, no voluntary. I'll take one voluntarily if it's necessary.
|
Hana, I think being down to 0 provinces exempts you from that necessity, even if it existed=) And anyway, I'm sorry... but then, I always wondered what would happen if Ermor and Marignon started adjacent 
|

January 11th, 2004, 04:51 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ryan Eye MP Game (thread name changed)
Is it possible to keep fighting with 0 provinces? I suppose if some dominion still exists and there's hidden commander (or god) one could make a comeback.
P.S. Quick work, Saber Cherry
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|