|
|
|
 |

January 9th, 2004, 11:38 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by gregarine:
The Computer Gaming World review was what got me to come here and order the game. They made the game sound very/deep and complex which is what I like!
|
Same here (CGW and the tutorial site).
|

January 10th, 2004, 12:01 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
I found the game to be extremely swift to figure out - at least in terms of the basics. I downloaded the demo, and (with particular gratitude to the between-turn tips) figured out most everything you need to play the game in a game or two.
Of course, the game is still springing surprises on me, but that's the sign of a well-made game. It's the same thing that kept Nethack going so long, really - easy to start, but there always seems to be more to discover.
|

January 10th, 2004, 12:39 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
At surface level, I thought the game was sorta like Risk when I first picked up [Dom1]. Reading Usenet, I saw people screaming about sick units and combinations (and of course, SC's); however, having been raised in an age where strong units in video games actually LOOK like strong units, it took me a while to get used to the understated-yet-still-quite-strong units in Dominions.
More complex than Dominions? Only a few roguelikes come to mind. And of course, they're all free.
|

January 10th, 2004, 04:13 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
|

January 10th, 2004, 04:38 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by Griswel:
quote: Originally posted by gregarine:
The Computer Gaming World review was what got me to come here and order the game. They made the game sound very/deep and complex which is what I like!
|
Same here (CGW and the tutorial site). It was CGW battle report that cinched it for me. I just got the game and haven't got over the learning curve yet so I spend most of the time crouched in my little provinces, playing with magic and hoping none of the computers notice me.
__________________
Clinically Inept
The Eternal Newb
|

January 10th, 2004, 05:37 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by Wauthan:
I guess Illwinter will add a step by step tutorial for Dominions 3: Fall of the Gods that explains its detailed and streamlined userinterface?
If it had not been for this forum, and particularly the works of Saber Cherry, I would simply have given up on the game and saved my money for Warlords Battlecry 3. Now I'm glad I didn't. This game is very addictive, and I eagerly await the patch. Learning the game is pretty fast actually. Mastering it enough to beat the computer on easy is a whole other matter.
|
It's funny you should mention that! I consider Warlords Battlecry II to be an exceptional game... on par with Kohan, if not Total Annihilation. And yet - I've been playing Dominions for a couple years, and am writing (to my knowledge) its only combat sim... and am still completely unfamiliar with most of the spells and 60% of the units
I think that's what I like about it. There are just too many variables to ever do anything "perfectly"... not because it is too hard... but because there is no "perfect way".
-Cherry
|

January 11th, 2004, 08:59 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
I also learned of Dom2 from the CGW review and battle report, but it wasn't the first time I'd been to Shrapnel Games. I've been playing computer strategy games for about 20 years, and Dom2 probably had the biggest learning curve of any of them. I studied the game, the manual (such as it is), the CGW battle report about 10 times, everything on this forum, and kept thinking about the game constantly for almost a week before I felt like I really knew what I was doing. My first five or six games I was VERY slow, and I got slaughtered. I finally won for the first time tonight, as Ulm against average Jotunheim and Michtlan on the Urgaia map. An easy setting, of course, but I wanted to see one all the way through.
This is a really, really good game. Definitely more difficult and interesting than AOW:SM, which is a mighty good game.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|