|
|
|
 |

January 24th, 2004, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
mmh, and so do you think that its normal that half of the group (the unengaged part) sit iddly in the rear of the formation (with 3 javelins still unused), and watch their comrades die in melee, without using their javelin?
|
Maybe not "normal" (as in real life), but if their comrades are meleing unit F while the whole squad was ordered to fire at S, and S is out of range, it's certainly understandable - from a programmatic POV.
__________________
God does not play dice, He plays Dominions Albert von Ulm
|

January 24th, 2004, 06:28 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
We know that its surely not the fear of doing some losses by friendly fire that can motivate them in doing nothing so why are they sitting on the grass?
|
It likely is this. One addition to the battle AI in Dom2 is that it's much more careful about choosing targets that won't cause as many friendly fire problems as in dom 1. The devs have commented on this occasionally.
|

January 24th, 2004, 11:32 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
|

January 25th, 2004, 01:16 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by PDF:
quote: Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
quote: Originally posted by Pocus:
We know that its surely not the fear of doing some losses by friendly fire that can motivate them in doing nothing so why are they sitting on the grass?
|
It likely is this. One addition to the battle AI in Dom2 is that it's much more careful about choosing targets that won't cause as many friendly fire problems as in dom 1. The devs have commented on this occasionally. Herrr, on that point issue is still there : my Ulm crossbowmen just shot in the back Raterik their leader (with Fire sword, Elem Armor, Charcoal Shield, and even Bracers of Prot...) !!!!
And don't tell me that's normal, he was giving the Last blows to a half dozen enemy archers, with the rest of their army already routed !!! Obviously, it's hard for the AI to decide when something it worth the risk of friendly fire.
I'd understand the request for "don't fire at a routing enemy if there are friendly units within X squares", but in what you're describing, Raterik had technically not routed the enemy yet, so his standing orders of "fire at the bastards until they rout" were still good. From what I've heard of the Ulmish military code, disobeying orders can get you in no end of trouble, but there's no provisions for accidental friendly fire - they were playing smart... 
|

January 25th, 2004, 04:40 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
We in the military call this a "Fragging". It happens to leaders who are overly gung-ho. In the middle of the night, the men will arrange to have a hand-grenade rolled into your tent, since your antics are considered to severely reduce their odds of survival.
I'm sure that this is the Ulmish Version of a fragging.
|

January 25th, 2004, 07:58 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 590
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by PDF:
Herrr, on that point issue is still there : my Ulm crossbowmen just shot in the back Raterik their leader (with Fire sword, Elem Armor, Charcoal Shield, and even Bracers of Prot...) !!!!
And don't tell me that's normal, he was giving the Last blows to a half dozen enemy archers, with the rest of their army already routed !!!
|
I had a Troll Lord decked out with Asterik's Armor (the golden artifact one), Champion's Trident (he just and I mean JUST won the dang thing), a spirit helment, and a couple of misc stuff, can't remember. I had a wraith sword on him before he won the tourney, and forgot to change his orders and he rushed and routed the entire enemy infantry squads (about 60) by himself and had 5 hp left and he had just routed the Last squad when a volley of xbows from my fearless, and apparently blind Ulmish Xbow squad. I still weep late at night.
[ January 25, 2004, 05:59: Message edited by: OG_Gleep ]
|

January 25th, 2004, 09:19 AM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by Nagot Gick Fel:
quote: Originally posted by Pocus:
mmh, and so do you think that its normal that half of the group (the unengaged part) sit iddly in the rear of the formation (with 3 javelins still unused), and watch their comrades die in melee, without using their javelin?
|
Maybe not "normal" (as in real life), but if their comrades are meleing unit F while the whole squad was ordered to fire at S, and S is out of range, it's certainly understandable - from a programmatic POV. they had hold and attack closest. In this case F, unless closest is determined initially and not recomputed, but I dont even want to take into account this stupid possibility.
Friendly fire fear is certainly not a possibility, as the algorithm presiding it will still order a whole host of crossbowmen to fire on a single enemy unit just close to your men. PDF gave a good example, and I have also one from a Last turn. 25 Hoburgs Xbow men (mine) firing against a single enemy (a light inf), which happen to be adjacent to 6 abysian infantries... Dont tell me that the friendly fire algo is smart here.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|