Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
I got sent the same turn file as Last go around.. the numeric coscript on my turns has been higher than the others in the mass mailing... is this perhaps why?
Eager to get the latest turn file, which should be turn 5 yes?
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Quote:
Originally posted by sachmo: Anyone else have an opinion?
Patching will be good, if not necessary, for the some of the bugs (paralyze, orb lightning).
I generally believe the developers tweak the game balance in the right way. But for us to patch now, it's like changing some of the rules in the middle of the game. Don't know. It depends on how many more of us are affected.
For the record - the patch doesn't affect me in any bad way.
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Quote:
Originally posted by rabelais: Dammit! There goes my goddamn research...
I still don't understand why they changed WD's... machaka's mages are too expensive to be overpowered.
Now the WD's are almost useless .... except for forging fever fetishes.
Rabe the Whiny Biatch
I won't called a non-capital 1 Fire/1 Death/1 Nature Mage useless, especially at the price of 80 gold. Send them out to battle and you'll see how useful they could be. Their Fire and Earth level can be easily raised to 2 with just 1 gems (each).
Man's Bard is 75 and has only 1 Nature. The only mages in the game who have a better value are Utgard's Seithkona.