Jotunheim:Utgard AAR

Arryn · #1 June 24th, 2004, 02:28 AM

I have not applied 2.12 as yet. I've both been too busy to play Dom, and I've also been waiting to see if there are any hidden, nasty, surprises in the 2.12 patch that might cause me grief, when I do get back to doing the AAR.

Scott Hebert · #2 June 24th, 2004, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arryn:
I have not applied 2.12 as yet. I've both been too busy to play Dom, and I've also been waiting to see if there are any hidden, nasty, surprises in the 2.12 patch that might cause me grief, when I do get back to doing the AAR.

Not that I'm any expert on the subject, but my game patched without a flaw, and I'm using a pre-2.12 VQ.

I would like to see your AAR continued. My AAR is a pale imitation of yours.

Arryn · #3 June 24th, 2004, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott Hebert:
Not that I'm any expert on the subject, but my game patched without a flaw, and I'm using a pre-2.12 VQ.

I would like to see your AAR continued. My AAR is a pale imitation of yours.

VQs aside, once bitten, twice shy. I was bit badly on the 2.08 patch. So I'm in no hurry whatsoever to apply 2.12 until I'm quite sure that it won't adversely affect my game.

Perhaps your imitation of my AAR is 'pale' because your pretender is a blood-sucking *****? heh
Regardless, thanks for your compliment, and imitation is even more sincere flattery.

Scott Hebert · #4 June 24th, 2004, 02:13 PM

Quote:

VQs aside, once bitten, twice shy. I was bit badly on the 2.08 patch. So I'm in no hurry whatsoever to apply 2.12 until I'm quite sure that it won't adversely affect my game.

Yes, I remember the 2.08 fiasco.

Quote:

Perhaps your imitation of my AAR is 'pale' because your pretender is a blood-sucking *****? heh

Hey, it's BF Ulm? Who better to use a VQ?

Quote:

Regardless, thanks for your compliment, and imitation is even more sincere flattery.

You're quite welcome. Between my AAR and various statistical projects I have going on, I'm busy enough.

Inigo Montoya · #5 July 30th, 2004, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott Hebert:

quote:
Perhaps your imitation of my AAR is 'pale' because your pretender is a blood-sucking *****? heh

Hey, it's BF Ulm? Who better to use a VQ?

Scott, I think you missed Arryn's point. She wasn't giving you a hard time for using a VQ. She was exceedingly clever about your AAR being a pale comparison. The reason your AAR was pale (as in white or exhibiting pallor) is because of the blood-sucking action of your VQ. She was ribbing you about blood loss.

Get it?

[Edited for grammer]

[ July 30, 2004, 17:22: Message edited by: Inigo Montoya ]

Inigo Montoya · #6 July 30th, 2004, 06:20 PM

Double post.

[ July 30, 2004, 17:21: Message edited by: Inigo Montoya ]

Arryn · #7 July 30th, 2004, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Inigo Montoya:
Scott, I think you missed Arryn's point. She wasn't giving you a hard time for using a VQ. She was exceedingly clever about your AAR being a pale comparison. The reason your AAR was pale (as in white or exhibiting pallor) is because of the blood-sucking action of your VQ. She was ribbing you about blood loss.

Heh, I was wondering how long it'd take for someone, anyone, to comment on that. Gee, it only took 5 weeks ...

EDIT: sometimes (okay, maybe a lot) I'm too clever for my own good.

[ July 30, 2004, 17:41: Message edited by: Arryn ]