|
|
|
|
 |

March 4th, 2004, 07:18 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
I generally attempt to expand in a manner which leaves me with the minimum exposure possible: Chokepoints, large provinces that shield other provinces behind them, and othersuch that reduce my level of exposure to unfriendlies. One of the things I really love about my favorite nation, Ermor, is indelibly marking my territory in a "what's mine is mine" sort of way.
|

March 5th, 2004, 05:20 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: st. paul MN
Posts: 166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
thankx for the replies
|

March 5th, 2004, 06:55 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
I'm not your better, only a newbie, but I'd like to add that I tend to play conservativly and my patterns ditto Gandalf P's fairly well, with one thing to add: I make liberal use of fortresses, especially if snaking. I hate starving, and I like having a larger army around, especially when recruiting mercs far from home. I scout as best as I can, always recruiting a scout if available in the provinces I take in turns 2-5), and try to take my next provinces (the ones not immediatley around my starting province, which I take first unless there is a good reason not to (like tons of knights)). I then go for "strategic building", that is: I try to beeline towards provinces with good units to recruit (in many cases with nations I play: Heavy Cavs) plus resources and build there.
|

March 5th, 2004, 09:13 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
Quote:
Originally posted by CharonJr:
In my current AAR (vs. AIs) due to my fairly large army and passive AIs (likely due to my large army) I don't bother CharonJr
|
AI opponents do appear as tho they are behaving alot more passively. Ermor had 1,200 troops just sitting in his castle for 15 turns... eventually I acquired flames_from_the_sky which killed 493 of his units. Until patch 2.08 I've never seen ERMOR just sitting on his hands. In this game there was a time he was strong enough to easily kill me... now he can't do anything but dig his own grave. Even C'TIS only conquered 3 provinces after 40 turns. Independent Setting was 6.
Has anyone else noticed the AI opponents as being more peaceful ?? (hopefully its just a one-time experience)
[ March 05, 2004, 19:17: Message edited by: NTJedi ]
__________________
There can be only one.
|

March 5th, 2004, 11:14 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
Quote:
Originally posted by NTJedi:
Until patch 2.08 I've never seen ERMOR just sitting on his hands. In this game there was a time he was strong enough to easily kill me... now he can't do anything but dig his own grave.
|
Ah, but only after the grave is Ermor powerful! 
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

March 5th, 2004, 11:17 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: land acquisition methods....
Quote:
Originally posted by NTJedi:
Has anyone else noticed the AI opponents as being more peaceful ?? (hopefully its just a one-time experience)
|
I still find them to be fairly aggressive, and in all my recent games they still tend to chew through indie provinces. But then again I play with indie strength at either 4 or 5, not 6.
__________________
I agree with the realistic Irishman who said he preferred to prophesy *after* the event.
-- G.K. Chesterton
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|