|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 12th, 2004, 02:37 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 510
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 Equal distribution as far as my observations indicate.
 
 The odds of NOT getting an extra water on a S&A Celestial Master would be ~76.6%. In other words, you can expect almost 1 out of 4 Celestial Master's to get at least 3 water, which certainly leads to the feeling that a lot of Celestial Masters get this bonus.
 
 However, it should be noted that the number of mages of the same type recruited in a single game are often too low to use for any sort of statistics. I player a S&A game where 3 out of 5 Celestial Masters recruited in the first ten turns 1 blood, and by the end, 7/17 recruited had 1 blood - which are too few to use for a good statistical analysis, really, and certainly fall within the range of an "equal distribution" hypothesis. (It was fun though)
 
				__________________When I said Death before Dishonour, I meant alphabetically.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 12th, 2004, 02:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 1,276
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 
	Thanks much sir. Suspected as much.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Peter Ebbesen: Equal distribution as far as my observations indicate.
 
 The odds of NOT getting an extra water on a S&A Celestial Master would be ~76.6%. In other words, you can expect almost 1 out of 4 Celestial Master's to get at least 3 water
 |  I know too little about statistics to remember standard deviance and what not, but may I ask an unqualified question?
 
 - If 1 out of 4 CMs gets at least 3 water, then isnt the chance also that 1 out of 4 CMs gets 2 Fire, Astral or Air? (Chance of getting +1 water = chance of getting +1 to anything else they already have, right?)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 12th, 2004, 02:57 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 510
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 
	Depends on how you phrase the questionQuote: 
	
		| Originally posted by tinkthank: - If 1 out of 4 CMs gets at least 3 water, then isnt the chance also that 1 out of 4 CMs gets 2 Fire, Astral or Air? (Chance of getting +1 water = chance of getting +1 to anything else they already have, right?)
 |    
 If you ask, what are the odds of a Celestial Master to get at least 2 Fire, it is indeed ~23.4% under the equal distribution hypothesis. [And likewise if you ask specifically about 2 Air or 2 Astral]
 
 If you ask, what are the odds of a Celestial Master getting at least 2 Fire or at least 2 Air or at least 2 Astral, the odds are much, much, higher. Since the chance of getting NO extra fire, air, or astral would be 5/8*5/8 ~ 39.1%, you can expect 60.9% of Celestial Masters to have at least 2 picks in one of the minor default paths.
				__________________When I said Death before Dishonour, I meant alphabetically.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2004, 03:20 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 1,276
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 Heh thanks.I always wondered: If there is a 1% chance of an event happening, and you looked at 100 possible event-worlds, what are the chances of it happening once? If it is 1/100 + 1/100 ..., wouldnt that make it 100/100? Does that mean there is a 100% chance of it happening? That just sounds absurd to me. Obviously, "chances are" that it will happen, but what the heck does that mean? (Is my question clear or must I be more precise?)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2004, 03:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Eastern Finland 
						Posts: 7,110
					 Thanks: 145 
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 Happening once or  atleast  once? That is a world of difference... Interesting question, anyway. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2004, 03:50 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Near Paris, France 
						Posts: 1,566
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 
	eheh, probabilities... Your additive method only works with very small chances/small number of occurences, but in this case it's faulty.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by tinkthank: Heh thanks.
 I always wondered: If there is a 1% chance of an event happening, and you looked at 100 possible event-worlds, what are the chances of it happening once? If it is 1/100 + 1/100 ..., wouldnt that make it 100/100? Does that mean there is a 100% chance of it happening? That just sounds absurd to me. Obviously, "chances are" that it will happen, but what the heck does that mean? (Is my question clear or must I be more precise?)
 |  A 1% chance event has an *average* chance of NOT occurring (at all) of (1-0.01)^100, that's 33.6%, so chance of occuring *at least once* is 66.4 %
 However the average *number* of occurence is  1 (ie it will sometimes occur 0 time, other 1 time, or more, but average still is 1%*100 = 1)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2004, 03:51 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 1,276
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are some randoms more random than others? 
 I dont know.I'll put it this way.
 If you flip a coin, there is a 1/2 chance it will come up heads. If you flip it twice, there is a 2/2 chance you will get heads in one out of those two times -- right? So I think that means "once"?
 But it would be absurd to say there is a 100% chance of you getting heads, so I must be confused somewhere, or maybe it is a language thing.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |