|
|
|
 |

April 14th, 2004, 11:44 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Quote:
Originally posted by Wauthan:
Light Infantery would be more useful if the battleground itself varied a bit more. On a dry flat ground it's pretty obvious that a man with heavy plate armour will have an advantage over a man in a leather cuirass. But if there was a penalty to encumberance in muddy, uneven, snowy, elevated or vegetation covered battlefields then the light infantery would have the upper hand.
[snip]
Being able to choose your battleground if you have the faster army would be a nice addition to Dominions III.
|
Very true! Unfortunately Dominions 2 isn't really setup to handle this.
|

April 14th, 2004, 11:53 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Quote:
Originally posted by Wendigo:
I actually like the hirdmen for default Vanheim. They are my 'center of the line' troop of choice when facing Ermorian hordes for example, and they specifically shine for default Van when combined with the supberb Dwarf support mages.
|
Yah, it's good to look at the full picture. Easy access to buffing spells helps vanheim immensely; it'd also help other factions, but they often don't have such easy access. I'm still not so fond of the Hirdmen though, as these things can also be done for other factions (e.g. Ulm, Machaka, Arcoscephale), if not as easily.
Vanheim has one of my favorite troop selections as well, in sharp contrast to many factions which have a wide swath of marginal troops. Both the Van and Valkyrie are a nice option (especially with blessing + Strength of Giants), and the Einheres really pack a bite once berserk.
[ April 14, 2004, 11:04: Message edited by: Jasper ]
|

April 14th, 2004, 12:03 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Quote:
Originally posted by Firebreath:
Is there a place to suggest improvements to the appropriate people somewhere in this forum? Something like heavy inf. get a heavy encumberance penalty (+100%) when fighting in mountains, 50% in forests, etc. A 'attack and swarm enemy flank, then run away before the center has time to react' command might be interesting for fast LI.
|
The place for suggestions is pretty much here. The developers skim through, and sometimes pick up things without commenting.
My first thought was that a general battle effect from a province's terrain doesn't make any sense, as the battle will be fought in some open area. But your suggest could represent the effect of carrying heavy equipment through rough terrain and showing up to a battle tired, which is quite reasonable!
Perhaps heavily encumbered troops could start with some fatigue in "heavy" terrain provinces?
|

April 14th, 2004, 12:09 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Quote:
Perhaps heavily encumbered troops could start with some fatigue in "heavy" terrain provinces?
|
This is a pretty interesting idea, and the type of flavour thing IW favours adopting.
Maybe also easy to implement, same as we have extreme cold/heat penalties to encumbrance depending on province weather scales, we could have some penalties depending on province terrain.
Just should be careful not to make 0-encumbrance troops too powerful from such change.
|

April 14th, 2004, 12:16 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Indeed. Plausible, simple to implement, and doesn't require extending the user interface.
I have my doubts on how it might affect 0-encumberance troops as well, and no trick comes to mind to alleviate them. Perhaps it's not so bad if such troops get a bonus in rough terrain? It's certainly thematic.
Not applying this penalty to commanders might help, so as not to penalize mages which often an effective counter to 0-enc units.
|

April 14th, 2004, 12:25 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
in the same trend, perhaps heavy terrains can give added fatigues to troops, each round. This added fatigue is moreover not given linearly, but is derivated from the encumberance, so that light troops get only +1 penalty in the heaviest terrains, while HI get an added +2 to +4:
unit encumberance; added fatigue:
1-3 : +1 in swamp or mountain
4-5 : +1 in forest, +2 swamp or mountain
6-7: +2 in forest, +3 swamp or mountain ...
modify this by -1 if terrain survival ability is presents.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|

April 14th, 2004, 12:29 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Light Infantry... what the ****
Faster fatigue during the battle gives me mental dissonance, as there is no terrain on the battlefield. If the field _were_ uniformly covered in rough terrain, then units like HI, cavalry, and archers should be useless.
Partially covering terrain would be ok, but is just too complex for the dominions battle engine to handle (and is perhaps better handled in another game...).
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|