|
|
|
 |

May 7th, 2004, 07:17 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Tris:
I don't vote, as I believe this to be the best way to register my disillusionment with the political parties in this country, who no longer stand for anything other than being elected.
|
And by not participating, you do sort of forfeit the right to complain about the outcome. After all, YOU certainly didn't do anything about it.
Me, realistically, I don't see my vote as having any real effect on the outcome. I *CAN*, however, indicate my dissatisfaction with both major parties by voting for neither of them. Then I spend the rest of the next 4 years complaining about it. Then I do it again. It's a living. If enough people were to take a stand and vote for their own dignity and personal integrity, something might happen. In the meantime, I'll just sit here and await the revolution.
|

May 7th, 2004, 08:25 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
"Tired of choosing the lesser of two evils? Vote Cthulu!"
(Quote from a pin that was massively popular in the ... 80s when I frequented a lot of OrcCons and other gaming conventions.)
|
That's great!
I also like the bumper-stickers I've seen which are in the style of red white and blue stars and stripes and say "Anybody Else 2004".
Also, yes, the two-party system is not much of a democracy, especially when the voting system only allows one mututally-exclusive positive vote per position, so even if the choices are two bad party tyrants and one OK independent person, people think they are "wasting their vote" on an independent vote. If you could vote for some, none, or all, then it would be much fairer (people could vote for the OK person AND their least hated tyrant, and the most popular candidate would actually win, instead of the most popular Big Party candidate (or the big party candidate who had supporters in the vote-counting business!)).
PvK
|

May 8th, 2004, 12:28 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Nagot Gick Fel:
quote: Originally posted by Stormbinder:
quote: Originally posted by Nagot Gick Fel:
Then you should have made the poll results viewable by non-voters as well.
|
Hmm is there such option? Or you mean adding "non-USA observer" vote option? The former. There's an 'advanced' setting that allows everyone to view the poll results. I checked it for the 'Ermorythiumephale etc.' poll. Didn't know about that. Thanks, I'll keep it in mind for the future.
|

May 8th, 2004, 01:11 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 181
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Norfleet:
quote: Originally posted by Duncanish:
You're right. Both candidates are awful. Therefore, you should vote for the lesser of the two evils, so to speak.
|
Or I can refuse to compromise my principles and vote independent. Either way, my vote makes no difference, but I keep my dignity, and when it goes to hell, I can say, "I didn't vote for him."
And if enough people cared about dignity, honor, and integrity, we might actually win for a change. Oh my! I actually totaly agree with Norfleet!! 
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
- Henry Louis Mencken
|

May 10th, 2004, 10:53 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
And by not participating, you do sort of forfeit the right to complain about the outcome. After all, YOU certainly didn't do anything about it.
|
There has been growing coverage in the media of "disillusioned voters" largely backed up by statistics of a falling turn out at elections.
You can see the effects of me -*not doing anything about it*- on Primetime news.
Quote:
I *CAN*, however, indicate my dissatisfaction with both major parties by voting for neither of them. Then I spend the rest of the next 4 years complaining about it. Then I do it again.
|
If you spend the next 4 years complaining about how another party would have done it better, then you have no excuse for not voting. If you see a viable party you believe would better represent you, vote for them. If you believe your political system has no such party, because major parties seek to occupy the middle ground just to be elected...
...like I said - my choice is heard on Primetime news. Show me another, more effective way to represent my dissatisfaction with the system.
|

May 10th, 2004, 05:35 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
quote: Originally posted by johan osterman:
quote: Originally posted by tinkthank:
...
allowing at present only 2 nationally funded parties (a non-trivial consequence of which is the fact that should there be one less party (a total of 1 instead of 2) we would have a dictatorship).
|
If we had five less parties represented in the swedish parlament (a total of 1 instead of 6) Sweden would also be a dictatorship, if we accept your usage of the term. Yes, but you have 6, we only have 2. This is not a mere contingency and it is not a trivial difference. You know what is funny? I've been several times in Israel. They have 100% democracy in your definition (parlament/election-wise, let's not get into discussion about arabs, counter-terrosrist measures, etc.).
So they have dozens of political parties in Kneset (Israel's parlament), some of them are very tiny. But it is huge pain in the arse to make a working "goverment coaltion", and even parties with 1 or 2 seats can very often become king makers, meaning they wield largly disproportional ammount of infulence in goverment. And once you get a ruling coalition going (that requres 60+ seats out of 120), it's often very difficult to maintain it for even half of the term, since every coalition memeber demands constant "bribing" (out of budget money) to stay in colation. And if the coalition breaks, you have short time to form another or must hold new election. All that makes persuing a consistent and focused policy next to impossible for any ruling party.
Now do you think israelis like their "pure" democratic parlament system? They hate it! I can't tell you how many times different people complained to me about inefficency of this system, and told me they wish they would have just 2 or 3 party system, like in the USA.
The bottom line is that you have to maintain a perspective when you are comparing different election/parlament system. Each one have some advantages and disadvantags. So having 2 party system have major advantages, as well as disadvantages.
P.S. Although I also wished there would be more choices for president. I mean, c'mon - are these people - Bush, Al Gore, Kerry - the best with what huge country can come up with for 8 years?!? 
|

May 10th, 2004, 09:40 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Totally off-topic poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Tris:
...like I said - my choice is heard on Primetime news. Show me another, more effective way to represent my dissatisfaction with the system.
|
He did. Cast a ballot, but only vote for things you actually support, or against things you don't. If you don't like any of the choices, don't vote for any of them, but do cast the ballot.
That way you actively show disapproval. Most of the people who don't vote are probably doing so because they don't care for whatever reason, and there's no way to tell the difference between an outraged person who doesn't show up as a protest, or someone who's just too lazy or clueless or apathetic.
PvK
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|