This game is an expensive coaster

[Sirkit]

I'd like to appilogize for my rant earlier but this guy rubs me the wrong way. This HAS always been a freindly forum but this thread and it's creator are changing that and it's the PITS!!! Okay hes upset because theirs no TCP/IP support to witch he beleives was promised him, got news for you it was MENTIONED not PROMISED there is a big diference there. I could say I'll send you world peace for your b-day but I won't because I can't I don't have time to solve every problem in the world, same goes for Aaron can you imagine how he would feel if he read this! He's benn called slow a backroom dealer and a LIAR!! How dare anyone say such a thing about anyone, let he who is perfect throw the first stone.

BTW Blizzard one of the largest and most influential programing companies has taken 3 YEARS from planing to present to send out War Craft 3 because they believe that if you take your time it will be better in the long run. Who here hasn't played StarCraft hmmm? It by the way took 4 Years to make.

My advice to Aaron would be take your time have a life go out on occasion as long as you keep us posted once and a while We'll still be here to defent your image from people like this who would throw the first stone by false beleif that they are perfect.

[Kagetora]

No, it looks like you are lacking in patience and are having a public snit over it.<<<<

Yeah, I am lacking in patience I only waited for 8 months without saying anything. Oh and the thing about the dog was a...well it was a joke. Apparently you have about as much a sense of humor as you do an intellect which is none. Many of you really need to quit playing this piece of crap game and go read a book. Then perhaps you could get your IQ's higher than your shoe sizes.

[This message has been edited by Kagetora (edited 26 May 2001).]

[jc173]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kagetora:
Was it ever really advertised? I only remeber it being mentioned as 'planned'. Post me a quote and I may feel otherwise.<<<<

What's the difference? Read the malfador news where at both Thanksgiving and Christmas Aaron said he was working on the multiplayer for the next patch. That was 6 months ago. You can't just spout features you intend to put in to get everybody to buy the game based on those claims then not follow through. If somebody sold you a house and said they would fix the roof and you moved in in good faith and then they didn't fix the roof. Not only would that be unethical as hell but they would be in violation of a verbal contract and would get their asses sued off. That is exactly what happened here.

---

Actually there's quite a bit of difference between an actual advertisement/contract and a list of features that may be implemented. There are laws that govern advertising, but I don't think a todo list is covered anywhere under contract law. It might depend on how the list itself was presented etc etc but I digress. If you want to get into the realm of contract law and other legalities, well nowhere in the those two news updates does it specifically state that either of the two updates in question refer to TCP/IP implementation of multiplayer games. The first refers to a utility to assist with muliplayer games which I guess is the PBEM tool, I can't be sure since I've never really taken a look at it though. The second update only refers to multiplayer enhancement.

[Resident Alien]

Close your eyes, listen to the sound of your breathing..... in, out, in, out...... be one with the sound of your breathing. Relax. Your mind is a calm pool.....

You like it, or you don't. If you do, play on. If you don't then, don't play. It's simple. You don't need to have the Last word. It's only a game.

[God Emperor]

Kagetora,
Just as a note; none of the mods in mod pack or my mods (ResearchDesign or Klingons, Romulans, Shadows, etc) actually give the AI an advantage. All they do is better optimise the way in which the AI operates - eg equips ships, does its research, reacts to political overtures, etc.

Now you can argue (with some justification perhaps) that this means that the game wasnt fully complete, but, the game architecture is far beyond any other game I have played.
Also, the willingness to undertake patches clearly demonstrates Aarons committment to the game.

The main thrust of my comment here is that the game should not be written off and assigned to the dustbin - any comments you make in this direction are unfounded.

I believe that you should limit your comments to the lack of TCP/IP support (which I would like to see at some point too) - most of your other comments reflect a lack of play experience with the game or the mods that are available for it, and appreciation of what has been done to date.

As a final comment, I too was reading the forum prior to the games release and noted the cries from people to have the game released as soon as possible, in whatever shape is was. I believe that Aaron responded to these demands to some extent and this made me wary initially of purchasing the game - I didnt actually order a copy until the second patch was released around Christmas time and I was able to assess peoples feedback in the forum.

Since I received my copy though, I have greatly enjoyed the game and many of the mods, despite some issues, and have not touched another game since.
For me (a very picky gamer), this places the game in the same Category as MOO2 and Civilisation in the addictiveness stakes.

As I said earlier, feel free to give your opinion regarding TCP/IP (in a non-imflammatory manner), but, dont cane the whole game - particularly if you havent experienced all of its potential (via mods, PBEM, etc).

[Master Belisarius]

Kagetora: if you want to play Online, you don't need to wait anymore for the TCP/IP feature in SE4! Simply go and play Homeworld or Imperium Galactica II, or wait for MOO3 and Stars! Supernova, or something else fantastic game.

[Atrocities]

Very well said God Emperor. Your skill with diplomacy is without second.