Vanheim Pretenders: Allfather and Asynya

[PvK]

Originally posted by atul:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
The virtue is pretty useless in a combat role, since she only has ~26 hitpoints. ...

Sorry to pick things out of context, but I've been wondering about this for a while now. I mean, while Virtue is indeed lacking in hitpoints and so on, I've found her good as an early game combat support.

The thing being, Awe +6. 0th circle spell Air Shield to protect her from missiles, a cheap armour in case a hit gets through, send her with your armies against indies like on turn 3. The opposition just stands there drooling at her while your troops close in for the kill. The secret of survival isn't high hp, prot or def, but the fact that no-one will hit her. Of course, provinces with high morale troops must be avoided, but as a such her aid in early expansion has been priceless.

I'm not arguing that the Virtue isn't quite useless, after all most high-morale units turn her into kebab, but I'd just like a second opinion on putting her in combat use: doable or just sheer madness? She has performed well in my tests but it may be just pure luck.

---

You people and your "(almost/quite/utterly) useless)" really need to find another adjective! You just mean "risky" or "sub-optimal because there are things with other qualities that I prefer", or are wrong, more often than not.

26 hit points is too fragile for combat? Gee, Pons my Black Lord hero on top of the hall of fame would have something to say about that. So would the majority of my other heroic fighters.

Virtue can be quite tough if you give her equipment, buffs, whatever. Not "optimal", though. The reasons I haven't chosen a Virtue prentender tend to be thematic, and that her fighting skills aren't particularly good, and that you can summon Virtues later on that are comparable.

PvK

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
The virtue is pretty useless in a combat role, since she only has ~26 hitpoints. ...

26 hitpoints too fragile for combat my ***. Tell that to the VQ drivers out there. We're fighting it out on 23 hitpoints. A Virtue is a perfectly serviceable light battle chassis. While certainly not up to the specs of a super-SC, she's quite serviceable and resilient for someone with a mere 26 HP. A few items can easily remedy most of her more annoying deficiencies, and her magic, while slightly inflexible, is certainly top-notch: It's hard for most units to penetrate a high-level mirror image, and mistform is a great HP multiplier: When you consider that, say, A natty with his measly protection, is being slammed for 10 points of damage out of his 80-odd HP, and can thus sustain maybe 9 hits before biting it, the fact that a virtue can soak down 26 normal hits due to mistform is a plus. Of course, you can slap Mistform on the others, too, but that'll cost you points in buying more air magic: An out of the box Virtue already can do that.

Virtue can be quite tough if you give her equipment, buffs, whatever. Not "optimal", though. The reasons I haven't chosen a Virtue prentender tend to be thematic, and that her fighting skills aren't particularly good, and that you can summon Virtues later on that are comparable.

They're not as easy to kill as their meager 26 HP would suggest....after all, when the game was first out, the VQ was discounted as a noncombatant as well. The amount of snivelling that has since surfaced has rather disproved that idea, though.

Ultimately, hitpoints are irrelevant: It's not how many hitpoints you HAVE, it's how many hitpoints you rake in vs. how many you lose: Your HP pool is simply a buffer. A larger buffer is nice, but not strictly necessary.

[ June 04, 2004, 20:05: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
26 hitpoints too fragile for combat my ***. Tell that to the VQ drivers out there. We're fighting it out on 23 hitpoints. A Virtue is a perfectly serviceable light battle chassis. While certainly not up to the specs of a super-SC, she's quite serviceable and resilient for someone with a mere 26 HP.

A couple of death 2-3 mages have a good chance of killing her with raise skeletons as she doesn't have 0 encumbrance. She also is vulnerable to windride. Her mistform will be defeated with only a few points of damage as well due to her low base hitpoints.

[ June 04, 2004, 19:26: Message edited by: Graeme Dice ]

[atul]

Originally posted by PvK:
You people and your "(almost/quite/utterly) useless)" really need to find another adjective! You just mean "risky" or "sub-optimal because there are things with other qualities that I prefer", or are wrong, more often than not.

Oops, what have I done. I hereby duck and cover behind the excuse that my country has only two official Languages (Finnish and Swedish) to explain my lack of vocabulary. As an evidence I present you the fact that I've never asked what "Något gick fel" means. Rereading my earlier post I indeed did a mistake of using the phrase 'useless' in the final paragraph, which was not my intent. But my hope lays in the fact that it might be evident from my earlier text that I meant more like 'to be used with caution, keep away from too tight places and children under age 6'.

But, seriously, what I tried to say earlier, was that actually I've been surprised by Virtue's efficciency. At first I dismissed her from straight-out combat role based on (pretender-wise) lowish hp, picking her for the high dominion, complimentary magic and cheapness. But when I got into a situation where I had to take her into combat I was very awed by the awe effect. I mean, name some other pretender you could place in front of 20 charging heavy cavalry in very early game? Even dragons are bound to get an affliction or two, but Virtue seems to be able to pull it off without a scratch. Relying to awe just makes the way she plays out very different from every other pretender. IMHO, of course. (and it'd seem some people think along same lines, which is always a relief when it comes to these things)

Just standing there with no-one willing to fight here, very angelic. Probably not as powerful as in Mikaelish style angelic, but some lesser angel. (Of course, that divine aura burning undead, that would be... well, my vocabulary fails me again)

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
A couple of death 2-3 mages have a good chance of killing her with raise skeletons as she doesn't have 0 encumbrance.

Slapping on a quick reinvigorator is enough to cure that problem, or Summon Earthpower, or any other light-reinvigoration options: The chassis, while not 0 encumberace, is fairly low-enc and has manageable fatigue with a few inexpensive items.

She also is vulnerable to windride.

Nothing a Robe of Etherealness or Wraith Crown can't fix. They're available earlier than Wind Ride is.

Her mistform will be defeated with only a few points of damage as well due to her low base hitpoints.

True, if you have something there that can hit hard enough to punch through mistform, but it's not like the VQ doesn't have the same problem.

My point isn't that the Virtue is one of the top-of-the-line SCs, but that despite her seemingly low stats, she can pull the job off adequately early game where it counts....and you can't argue with Wrathful Sky's effectiveness as a damage shield!

[ June 04, 2004, 20:09: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

[Nagot Gick Fel]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
My point isn't that the Virtue is one of the top-of-the-line SCs, but that despite her seemingly low stats, she can pull the job off adequately early game where it counts....and you can't argue with Wrathful Sky's effectiveness as a damage shield!

I concur. Thanks to low-level spells like Air Shield, Mirror Image and Shockwave I've found the Virtue to be a very effective territory grabber in the early game. And thanks to her high dominion base her hit points are usually more like 52 or above when she's ready to move. You just have to remember that at some point her role as a pocket SC will have to end, hopefully when that happens she'll have some big devastating battlespells in her grimoire.

[ June 04, 2004, 22:44: Message edited by: Nagot Gick Fel ]

[PvK]

Originally posted by atul:

quote:

---

Originally posted by PvK:
You people and your "(almost/quite/utterly) useless)" really need to find another adjective! You just mean "risky" or "sub-optimal because there are things with other qualities that I prefer", or are wrong, more often than not.

Oops, what have I done. I hereby duck and cover behind the excuse that my country has only two official Languages (Finnish and Swedish) to explain my lack of vocabulary. As an evidence I present you the fact that I've never asked what "Något gick fel" means. Rereading my earlier post I indeed did a mistake of using the phrase 'useless' in the final paragraph, which was not my intent. But my hope lays in the fact that it might be evident from my earlier text that I meant more like 'to be used with caution, keep away from too tight places and children under age 6'.
...

---

Sorry atul! Non-native English speakers are excused. "Useless" means "without any use" in English. Some native English speakers have been exaggerating and using "useless" when they mean something like "not the best" or "is not something I'd choose".

PvK