A very small suggetion to Illwinter

HotNifeThruButr · #1 July 2nd, 2004, 06:08 AM

Supposedly, they're the only who can control the slave lizards, so I guess they should have something linking them to slave lizards. I agree with quantum

tinkthank · #2 July 2nd, 2004, 11:30 AM

This sounds good.

Endoperez · #3 July 2nd, 2004, 05:55 PM

Thematic. I don't see why not.

quantum_mechani · #4 July 11th, 2004, 08:09 AM

A comment from the devs... please?

Kristoffer O · #5 July 11th, 2004, 10:15 AM

Actually we had something like that in mind when we developed Dom 1. Unfortunately we ended up with several dozens of commander types and it made leadership and micromanagement of armies a big bother. We had started to include leadership types for lizards, abysians, jotuns, knights (knights do not like to take orders from those not noble-born) etc.

Some kind of restriction with lizars slaves might be good though. The taskmaster is not very useful as it is.

Norfleet · #6 July 11th, 2004, 10:26 AM

Well, the suggested alternative was to have the Taskmaster be able to create Slave Warriors via a "capture slaves" option. Then maybe if Slave Warriors were then removed from the recruitable list, so in order to get them, you *HAD* to use Taskmasters, so they'd be kinda like Mictlan slaves, only with regular upkeep.

tinkthank · #7 July 11th, 2004, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Norfleet:
Well, the suggested alternative was to have the Taskmaster be able to create Slave Warriors via a "capture slaves" option. Then maybe if Slave Warriors were then removed from the recruitable list, so in order to get them, you *HAD* to use Taskmasters, so they'd be kinda like Mictlan slaves, only with regular upkeep.

Good.