.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
Bronze- Save $10.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 2: The Ascension Wars

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 19th, 2004, 02:15 PM
Graeme Dice's Avatar

Graeme Dice Graeme Dice is offline
General
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Graeme Dice is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
Thanks much sir.
So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
The pretender does not spread at the normal rate. The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 19th, 2004, 02:17 PM
tinkthank's Avatar

tinkthank tinkthank is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
tinkthank is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Thanks Graeme.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 19th, 2004, 11:29 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
Thanks much sir.
So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
The pretender does not spread at the normal rate. The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple.
Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 19th, 2004, 11:37 PM
Graeme Dice's Avatar

Graeme Dice Graeme Dice is offline
General
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Graeme Dice is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10. A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength. I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 20th, 2004, 10:42 AM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10. A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength. I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.
Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?

Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 20th, 2004, 02:39 PM
Graeme Dice's Avatar

Graeme Dice Graeme Dice is offline
General
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Graeme Dice is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?
Haven't you read the dominion guide? It's located here.

Quote:
Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks?
Dominion strength of 1 is succesful 10% of the time. Dominion strength of 10 is successful 100% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 20th, 2004, 10:13 PM
Stormbinder's Avatar

Stormbinder Stormbinder is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stormbinder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
Haven't you read the dominion guide? It's located here.


Generally speaking the answer RTFM is not considered to be a very polite one. I've read number of guides on Dom, official and none official ones. All of them were read a long time ago though, and I've been playing Dom2 ever since.

Also according to the guide you are wrong. You have said:

Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:


each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.

...while according to the quide, each pretender does "One automatic increase plus two temple checks". Also note that "automatic increase" is different from your "full stregth temple check", since temple check 10 always increase the dominion in *abjucent* province, while "automatic increase" can do it in the province itself, if dominion is less than 10.

Anyway, thanks for the link, now the matter is clear to me.

[ July 20, 2004, 21:39: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.