|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 19th, 2004, 02:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 3,013
					 Thanks: 17 
		
			
				Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	The pretender does not spread at the normal rate.  The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by tinkthank: Thanks much sir.
 So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 19th, 2004, 02:17 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 
						Posts: 1,276
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 Thanks Graeme. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 19th, 2004, 11:29 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CA 
						Posts: 744
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	The pretender does not spread at the normal rate.  The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Graeme Dice: 
 quote:Originally posted by tinkthank:
 Thanks much sir.
 So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
 |  Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 19th, 2004, 11:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 3,013
					 Thanks: 17 
		
			
				Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10.  A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength.  I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Stormbinder: Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
 |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 20th, 2004, 10:42 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CA 
						Posts: 744
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10.  A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength.  I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Graeme Dice: 
 quote:Originally posted by Stormbinder:
 Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
 |  Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?
 
 Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 20th, 2004, 02:39 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 3,013
					 Thanks: 17 
		
			
				Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	Haven't you read the dominion guide?  It's located    here.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Stormbinder: Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?
 |  
 
 
	Dominion strength of 1 is succesful 10% of the time.  Dominion strength of 10 is successful 100% of the time.Quote: 
	
		| Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks? |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 20th, 2004, 10:13 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CA 
						Posts: 744
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right? 
 
	Generally speaking the answer RTFM is not considered to be a very polite one. I've read number of guides on Dom, official and none official ones. All of them were read a long time ago though, and I've been playing Dom2 ever since.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Graeme Dice: Haven't you read the dominion guide?  It's located    here.
 
 
 
 |  
 Also according to the guide you are wrong. You have said:
 
 
 
	...while according to the quide, each pretender does  "One automatic increase plus two temple checks". Also note that "automatic increase" is different from your "full stregth temple check", since temple check 10 always increase the dominion in *abjucent* province, while "automatic increase" can do it in the province itself, if dominion is less than 10.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Graeme Dice: 
 
 each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.
 
 
 |  
 Anyway, thanks for the link, now the matter is clear to me.
 
 [ July 20, 2004, 21:39: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |